[Technical] OT - Help Please - Anti-Virus Software
recommendations?
Jim Maunder
techo at ruyton.vic.edu.au
Thu Jul 27 12:51:28 EST 2006
At 11:59 AM 27/07/2006, you wrote:
...
>We have been using VET but they are forcing a change on us that is not
>compatible so we need to look elsewhere.
>Here is the QUESTION posed by my technician:
>
>"Anti virus question to those members of the group that have Novell file
>servers with XP workstations.
> What antivirus solution do you have in place with server based updates?
> How efficient is this?
> Does it affect network performance, if not what speed does network run
>at?
> Any recomendations for a low grade network?
> Thanks."
We have Netware 6.5 servers and XP clients. Some years ago we had to
change from VET also, but stayed with Computer Associates. My boss is
away so I don't have definitive answers.
The workstations run the eTrust client (v7 at the mo). They are set
up to fetch the signature update via ftp from our intranet server.
Overnight a (Windows) box 'on the outside' fetches the updates from
CA's ftp. Every morning someone (moi at the mo) manually ftps the
sigs from the 'outside' box to the (linux) intranet box - takes a
minute all up.
I had some fun (not) setting up the clients so that a 'silent
install' could be done - nowhere near as easy as VET master
installation was. It involves editing 2 files - (inoc6.icf and
inodist.ini) to set preferences, then installing with this:
"...\etrust7\bin\eav_s.win\inosetup /s"
I seem to recall that you can do a manual install, set the
preferences, then copy these 2 files back to the \eav_s.win folder.
Updating seems to have minimal impact on network - manual download
takes a few seconds, while the automatic update takes place in the
background, usually when the user first connects to the network each
day. Our network is 100mbps with 1gbps backbone - but see above about
boss being away.
I think the licence costs about $12 a seat/year.
We are happy with eTrust - seems to work well enough.
Hope this helps.
rgds
Jim
-----------------------------------------------------------
We have to use this Disclaimer
Views, opinions, etc. expressed reflect those of the author and not
Ruyton Girls' School
-----------------------------------------------------------
Jim Maunder
Ruyton Girls School
Melbourne, Australia
More information about the tech
mailing list