[Year 12 SofDev] Criteria 3

[WILKIE. John]

Hi Stephen,

I interpret it as 'How much of the SRS is based on the information they gathered'.

If they have comprehensive data to work off and manage to outline all of it in the SRS, diagrams and all, then I'd lean towards the top marks.

The less data they collected the higher the chance that they've made up the requirements/scope/constraints. I told my class that if it wasn't in their data, it isn't to be in their solution.

I have 1 student that said he interviewed his mother, though when I rang home she knew nothing about it... I'm quite interested to see the information he submits to me.

I start with reading the data/information then checking that against the Functional and Non-functional Requirements. I then read the intention and the scope to see if they know what they're talking about. It should all line up pretty succinctly.


Regards,
John



From: sofdev [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Stephen Trouse
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2018 11:48 AM
To: sofdev at edulists.com.au
Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Criteria 3

Hi All,
I am battling to understand and interpret Criteria 3 of the SAT marking "Interpretation of data...", specifically "Draws a complete set of conclusions that are connected to, and consistent with, the data represented in the analytical tools".  Can anyone interpret this for me?
Stephen

________________________________

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email and then delete the email from your system. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and not necessarily those of Lavalla Catholic College. Thank you for your cooperation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20180516/d4d4b267/attachment.html>