[Year 12 SofDev] Query about marking SAT 2 criteria 6

Paragreen, Chris J paragreen.chris.j at edumail.vic.gov.au
Thu Jul 28 15:13:21 AEST 2016


Hi Vi,

I'm interpreting complex as meaning they code their own sort. Non-complex will be to use the internal sort function.
As for documentation, at the SAT day at VCAA it was mentioned that they don't need to go into big O notation (although for the top mark in this category I think that would be my discriminator), but they would need to provide some qualitative statements as to why the algorithm they chose was suitable for their particular application. Also discussed at the VCAA meet was that the "documentation" could be in the form of internal documentation (but did not have to be).

Regards,

Chris

From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Tran, Vi V
Sent: Thursday, 28 July 2016 2:55 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au>
Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Query about marking SAT 2 criteria 6


Hi all,

  I'm not sure if it has been answered on this edulist, but I have a question about marking Criteria 6 where it states "Documents the efficient use of a complex sorting algorithm in the solution".



>From my interpretation does this mean that students HAVE to use a sorting algorithm (they can choose from insertion, bubble, selection or quick sort? )



Complex means - they can only choose from selection and quick sort ( and not insertion or bubble sort)?

Document means - they need to explain and justify why they used the particular sorting algorithm? In terms of time complexity and usage of memory space?



I was wondering how others are marking this criteria.



Thank you.



>From Vi.

Mullauna College.

IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.



IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20160728/9da865fd/attachment.html 


More information about the sofdev mailing list