[Year 12 SofDev] SD Exam - Question C1c and AQ2

[Kevin Feely]

Hi
Thanks - i concede - oh and BTW could anyone post, fax, scan-email me a 
copy of the Applications exam?
kev


Selina Dennis wrote:
> I have to disagree with WikiPedia. While I can see the concept of
> "implementation" could contain all of the development, testing and
> deployment, and hence mean "implementation of the entire design", in most
> software development projects/life cycles, the implementation process occurs
> after testing - hence, is synonymous with deployment. However, I do concede
> the point that the question was slightly ambiguous, and some students could
> have read coding as 'implementation'.
>
> If you go by the SoftDev study design, the SDLC is ADDTDIE. Hence, students
> would need to separate implementation from development and place it in a
> position that relates to 'deployment'. As "coding" isn't part of the
> acronym, students would be incorrect in selecting C as the "best" answer.
> That's not to say it's not a valid answer, but it's not the best according
> to the glossary they are (unfortunately) meant to know by rote.
>
> Regards,
>
> Selina Dennis
> Strathmore Secondary College
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
> On Behalf Of Kevin Feely
> Sent: Friday, 16 November 2007 1:32 PM
> To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] SD Exam - Question C1c and AQ2
>
> Hi Selina,
>
> Implementation (or coding) </wiki/Implementation> 
>     Reducing a design to code may be the most obvious part of the
>     software engineering job, but it is not necessarily the largest
>     portion. 
>
> taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_process
> regards
> kev
>
> Selina Dennis wrote:
>   
>> Implementing is releasing completed code for use - ie: deployment. Coding
>>     
> is
>   
>> development.
>>
>> Selina Dennis
>> Strathmore Secondary College
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au
>>     
> [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
>   
>> On Behalf Of Kevin Feely
>> Sent: Friday, 16 November 2007 9:38 AM
>> To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] SD Exam - Question C1c and AQ2
>>
>> Hi mark
>> Yep, happy with that, but during the year have let my kids "define" the 
>> system so they  decide what is inside and outside, but generally i have 
>> set rules that what belongs inside must be "processors" - they have a 
>> role to play in taking input and doing something with it. A secretary 
>> "files" reports or the workshop manager "calculates" hours worked etc. 
>> Rodneys Real Estate - a question on DFD's in a reference book is a 
>> classic where you can get quite a few different results - but all 
>> justifiably correct.
>>
>> Also i have a query on AQ2 program development life cycle - i assume B 
>> is correct, while D and A can quickly be eliminated - no operating or 
>> solving in key cycle terms. BUT i also regard coding and implementing  
>> as interchangeable terms ( a view backed up with a quick google) so then 
>> C also fits.
>> It would be hard to argue it is WRONG I think
>>
>> kev
>>
>>
>> Mark Kelly wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I have been independently informed by a reliable source that:
>>>
>>> 'They provide data to the 'system' rather then process the data so 
>>> they would be considered entities rather the part of the system.'
>>>
>>> Well, bounce on my ballpoint and call me Renaldo.  I've never heard of 
>>> that condition before.  DFDs seem to be an ever-deepening well of 
>>> intrigue!
>>>
>>> I wonder how many students will get that one right. Bother! I must 
>>> have missed a memo somewhere...
>>>
>>> Thanks, <Mystery advisor>
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
>>     
> received
>   
>> in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
>> attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
>> damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or
>> not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files
>>     
> our
>   
>> liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
>> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
>> and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early
>>     
> Childhood
>   
>> Development.
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.edulists.com.au
>> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
>> and
>> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html  -
>>     
> VITTA
>   
>> Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.edulists.com.au
>> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
>>     
> and
>   
>> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html  -
>>     
> VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>   
>>   
>>     
>
> Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received
> in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
> attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
> damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or
> not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our
> liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
> and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood
> Development.
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html  - VITTA
> Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
>   

Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.