[Year 12 SofDev] SD Exam - Question C1c and AQ2
Selina Dennis
selina at dennis.net.au
Fri Nov 16 16:54:32 EST 2007
I have to disagree with WikiPedia. While I can see the concept of
"implementation" could contain all of the development, testing and
deployment, and hence mean "implementation of the entire design", in most
software development projects/life cycles, the implementation process occurs
after testing - hence, is synonymous with deployment. However, I do concede
the point that the question was slightly ambiguous, and some students could
have read coding as 'implementation'.
If you go by the SoftDev study design, the SDLC is ADDTDIE. Hence, students
would need to separate implementation from development and place it in a
position that relates to 'deployment'. As "coding" isn't part of the
acronym, students would be incorrect in selecting C as the "best" answer.
That's not to say it's not a valid answer, but it's not the best according
to the glossary they are (unfortunately) meant to know by rote.
Regards,
Selina Dennis
Strathmore Secondary College
-----Original Message-----
From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
On Behalf Of Kevin Feely
Sent: Friday, 16 November 2007 1:32 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] SD Exam - Question C1c and AQ2
Hi Selina,
Implementation (or coding) </wiki/Implementation>
Reducing a design to code may be the most obvious part of the
software engineering job, but it is not necessarily the largest
portion.
taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_development_process
regards
kev
Selina Dennis wrote:
> Implementing is releasing completed code for use - ie: deployment. Coding
is
> development.
>
> Selina Dennis
> Strathmore Secondary College
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au
[mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
> On Behalf Of Kevin Feely
> Sent: Friday, 16 November 2007 9:38 AM
> To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] SD Exam - Question C1c and AQ2
>
> Hi mark
> Yep, happy with that, but during the year have let my kids "define" the
> system so they decide what is inside and outside, but generally i have
> set rules that what belongs inside must be "processors" - they have a
> role to play in taking input and doing something with it. A secretary
> "files" reports or the workshop manager "calculates" hours worked etc.
> Rodneys Real Estate - a question on DFD's in a reference book is a
> classic where you can get quite a few different results - but all
> justifiably correct.
>
> Also i have a query on AQ2 program development life cycle - i assume B
> is correct, while D and A can quickly be eliminated - no operating or
> solving in key cycle terms. BUT i also regard coding and implementing
> as interchangeable terms ( a view backed up with a quick google) so then
> C also fits.
> It would be hard to argue it is WRONG I think
>
> kev
>
>
> Mark Kelly wrote:
>
>> I have been independently informed by a reliable source that:
>>
>> 'They provide data to the 'system' rather then process the data so
>> they would be considered entities rather the part of the system.'
>>
>> Well, bounce on my ballpoint and call me Renaldo. I've never heard of
>> that condition before. DFDs seem to be an ever-deepening well of
>> intrigue!
>>
>> I wonder how many students will get that one right. Bother! I must
>> have missed a memo somewhere...
>>
>> Thanks, <Mystery advisor>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>
> Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
received
> in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
> attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
> damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or
> not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files
our
> liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
> and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early
Childhood
> Development.
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html -
VITTA
> Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html -
VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
>
Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received
in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or
not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our
liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood
Development.
_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au
IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
and
http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html - VITTA
Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
More information about the sofdev
mailing list