[Year 12 IPM] OT : LAN gaming
Keith Richardson
keithcr at fastmail.fm
Tue Feb 28 19:50:15 EST 2006
Stephen - I totally disagree!
If we carried your hypothesis to its logical conclusion, the only sports
games we would allow on the sport field or in the playground would be
<<"games" that deliver quality educational outcomes>>.
Computing, reading, running, catching, argueing, debating are all
legitimate human activities. Get a life, I say!
To me passion is everything - if people are passionately motivated, you
can climb mountains with them...
Back to you, my friend!
Keith
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:28:59 +1100, "Stephen Digby"
<digby.stephen.p at edumail.vic.gov.au> said:
> Suggest that only "games" that deliver quality educational outcomes be
> allowed in schools - full stop.
> We go out of our way to make the distinction between the legitimate use
> of computers in homes for a variety of purposes (from sexual
> gratification, through entertainment, to business and often some small
> education component) and the special use of computers in
> school for exclusively education purposes.
>
> Children arrive at school with a sense that the "natural" use of
> computers (and TV !) is entertainment. Every time we allow this
> within school, we accept that this is true and that educational
> activities are inherently second rate and can only be sustained with
> extrinsic motivators or punishments.
>
> I have the same opposition to the short-sighted use of videos,
> entertaining excursion and being "let off" early as rewards for good
> work.
> They all add to the same perception that education is drudgery. That all
> gain can be achieved without any pain. That perseverance
> is sometimes regrettably necessary in some subjects (probably because the
> teacher is not much good, or the content is old fashioned)
> etc etc.
>
> By all means involve students in game analysis and design which will
> involve playing in a disciplined, and reflective manner. But
> make sure that the games analysed, designed and played have deep
> intellectual content and preferably significant cultural
> significance.
>
> Students ARE challenged by playing war games - everything from chess,
> through RISK to historical battle simulations. They can learn
> excellent thinking skills, interpersonal strategies and a great deal of
> history IF the experience is guided by a good teacher (or
> parent).
>
> "Fun, amusement, entertainment" are often by products of a well designed
> educational activity - they should never be a core
> objective - even at lunchtime.
>
> As teachers, we can always invent some jargon filled rationalisation for
> what we often know to be capitulation to a culture of
> "little brain".
> If they are to play LAN games, make it "serious", make it challenging,
> make it - make it educational..... Can you do it ?
> Honestly ? If not, don't.
>
> ======================================================================================
> Stephen Digby, Learning Technology Manager
> digby.stephen.p at edumail.vic.gov.au
> Cheltenham Secondary College www.cheltsec.vic.edu.au Ph: 613 955 55 955
> Fx: 9555 8617
> ======================================================================================
>
>
>
> We Trained hard.....but it seemed that every time we were beginning to
> form up into teams, we would be re-organised... I was to
> learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by
> re-organising....and a wonderful method it can be for creating the
> illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency and
> demoralisation. Petronius 210 BC
>
>
> _____
>
> From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au] On
> Behalf Of WEIR Andrew
> Sent: Monday, 27 February 2006 7:15 PM
> To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
> Teachers'Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Year 12 IPM] OT : LAN gaming
>
>
>
> Andrew
> Thanks for that we have started to investigate games without a violence
> aspect straight after i sent the email the students involved
> understand the issues with perception of violence.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of Andrew Shortell
> Sent: Mon 2/27/2006 3:32 PM
> To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
> Teachers'MailingList
> Subject: RE: [Year 12 IPM] OT : LAN gaming
>
> Andrew,
> Counter strike is a game that encourages a lot of noise from the
> participants. (I really mean a lot.) The game server needs its firewall
> disabled. The game runs quicker on a dedicated machine.
>
> Questions I would ask include:
> Parental permission ?
> Encouraging violence?
> Against the ethos of TC College - religious affiliation etc, biblically
> inclined parents etc
> Bad reaction from RE teachers?
>
> The fact that it will be almost entirely boys .. this is not a girl
> friendly environment ...
>
> I endured it on Wednesday afternoons last year --- some loved it, some
> grew bored
>
> LAN gaming is big, there must be better ones out there than CS
> Good luck
>
> Andrew Shortell
> Braemar College
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au]
> On Behalf Of WEIR Andrew
> Sent: Monday, 27 February 2006 3:07 PM
> To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
> Teachers'MailingList
> Subject: [Year 12 IPM] OT : LAN gaming
>
> Apologies for the off topic question
>
> Some of my students have expressed interest in wanting to run a lunch
> time LAN party using the schools network before we rule it out or go
> ahead with it I wanted to see if any other schools had actually done it
> and what issues we might face.
>
> We have already begun to look at the following aspects;
> Game Rating and audience.
> Licenses
> Installation
>
> The students wanted to use Counter strike. There idea is charge a small
> admission fee and donate the money to charity.
>
> Any help or advice would be great.
> Andrew
>
> Andrew Weir
> Head Of Information Technology
> VK3HFT
> Thomas Carr College
> 35 Thomas Carr College Tarneit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> IPM Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
> Authority and
> http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
> Teachers Association Inc
>
>
>
> Important -
> This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error,
> please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
> attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
> damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or
> not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files
> our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
> and not necessarily those of the Department of Education & Training.
Keith Richardson
Leibler Yavneh College
Elsternwick Ph (03)9528 4911
keithcr at fastmail.fm
More information about the ipm
mailing list