[Design and Technology] new study design comments due on Friday

[Robin Panousieris]

Hi all, 

 

We are all busy but will only have ourselves to blame if we don't respond to
the new draft study design document. 

 

There are issues that I am not happy with eg. 

-          How can we expect students to perform a LCA on the product they
make ? This is making the study design harder, unlike Food Studies that made
it more appropriate to what teachers and students wanted. 

-          It is now acceptable to make a prototype for units 1 - 4 !  but a
toile isn't accepted as a prototype.  Doesn't seem fair for textiles
students.  Some prototypes could be total rubbish and take no time to finish
. and in the Product design process it is only one of the steps not the
final step. 

-          7Ps now in Ps of marketing - is it in line with Business
Management Study Design and if not how confusing.  Where did that come from
not from common sense. 

-          How does a student decide how to mass produce the final product
once it's made, that seems crazy and again just gives them extra work when
we have one off and low volume production not just mass production (at least
mass production is back as is planned obsolescence that gets my vote) 

-          3 end users need to be approached in the final evaluation . How
does my current student find 3 end users when he is from Zimbabwe and made
it to suit the needs and wants of his mother who is his client. Are we now
totally discouraging this type of innovation and creativity ?  

-          No client by the way only end user - don't like that. 

 

Oh and the original mess up that resulted in Units 1 & 2 having a 3 part
evaluation criteria and Unit 3 & 4 having a 4 part hasn't been fixed. 

 

The Product design process wheel still doesn't reflect the wording in the
study design closely enough. 

 

So have your say or we can only reflect on what could have been. 

 

 

Regards 

Robin 

Marymede Catholic College 

 

From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of E.Italiano
Sent: Monday, September 5, 2016 1:00 PM
To: 'Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Design and Technology] Text Book

 

Hi Dean

Is there a new addition of the textbook for 2017?

The changes to the study design are only minor, I am wondering if there is a
need for students to buy the new textbook?

Regards

Liz 

 

From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Lambert Dean
Sent: Monday, 5 September 2016 12:52 PM
To: 'Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List' <destech at edulists.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Design and Technology] Text Book

 

Jo, 

 

They still appeared on my booklists which came directly from our college
organiser at my school. I know there are some minor changes to the study
design from unit 1-4 as per the emails the other week. 

 

I wonder if the study design changes are reflective in the text and
workbooks for 2017?

 

Dean. 

 


Description: Description: cid:315320004 at 31012008-0F05

 

Dean Lambert

Faculty Leader - Technology

John Paul College

McMahons Road

Frankston VIC 3199

Ph 9784 0375

 

 

 

From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Jo Roszkowski
Sent: Monday, 5 September 2016 10:40 AM
To: destech at edulists.com.au
Subject: [Design and Technology] Text Book

 

Hi All

Does anyone know why Campion isn't listing the Livett / O'Leary textbook for
next year?

 

Thanks, 

Jo

This email and any attachments may be confidential. You must not disclose or
use the information in this email if you are not the intended recipient. If
you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the email and all copies. The College does not guarantee that this
email is virus or error free. The attached files are provided and may only
be used on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for any loss,
damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the
attached files, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not. The
content and opinions in this email are not necessarily those of the College.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/destech/attachments/20160905/5e5ca366/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3172 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/destech/attachments/20160905/5e5ca366/attachment-0001.jpe