[Yr7-10it] The Learning Federation
Costello, Rob R
Costello.Rob.R at edumail.vic.gov.au
Sat Jun 7 08:04:18 EST 2008
Bit revolutionary :)
While I'm sympathetic to what they're -trying- to do with the digital
learning objects ...
... I'm not at all sure
- that they really fit the needs of teachers / students etc
Eg :
- many activities feel like they hem you in - highly scripted, limited
choices, limited construction
- not sure whether the quality is there
- not sure whether trying to make so many works - most activities in
itself tend to be limited
- I wonder what the hit rate is for 'good' resources among all the work
that has been done
I've looked at the resources a few times :
Never seen or heard any secondary teacher outside of maths using any of
the objects - I'm sure a few people from the list will have?
But I wonder if the civics / humanities simulations are very usable -
especially post primary? I might be wrong - just haven't seen it
The money seems pretty huge
Comparisons might be odious, but I saw a trial of mathletics the other
day
Somehow or other they've hit on a model that both kids and teachers
instinctively felt would work - don't know I've often had a full class
for 73 minutes, without even one year 8 kid getting sidetracked
- it has a collaborative mode; allows kids to race against players from
around the world
Also has a framework that ties it together - points and credits
accumulate from different activities - uses avatars etc - something
about all that kids like
Also has a tracking system that gives you feedback on your kids / class
Allows lets you schedule homework activities
Can be accessed from home
Looks better to me.... focussed on one area... and does it really well
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yr7-10it-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:yr7-10it-
> bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of stephen at melbpc.org.au
> Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2008 12:58 AM
> To: oz-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au
> Cc: yr7-10it at edulists.com.au; english at edulists.com.au;
> itapps at edulists.com.au
> Subject: [Yr7-10it] The Learning Federation
>
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to be as fair as possible, on an important issue.
>
> What are people's thoughts regarding The Le at rning Federation?
>
> http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au
>
> The group was set up in 2001, by all Ed Ministers for, "developing and
> procuring online curriculum content specifically for Australian and
New
> Zealand curricula, and delivering it for free distribution to schools
..
> The Initiative has delivered a valuable national asset that will
directly
> support the national curriculum and assessment agenda for decades to
> come."
>
>
> Hmm .. sounds good. But, their funding runs out next year, by which
time I
> believe they were meant to be self-funding. But on their website they
have
> a plan for considerably more *government* funding.
>
> Ok, so, a fair question is, what has been achieved? Are they worth it?
The
> answer to this question is crucial, because with a national
curriculum,
> the Learning Federation products may well be mandatory for we teachers
(?)
>
> According to my reading of their website they have received $123
million
> over the previous seven years. And, in terms of achievements, they
write:
>
> > By 31 December 2007 the project:
> >
> > * published over 6300 items of digital content ..
>
>
> Hm, so .. that's $123 million .. divided by 6300 curriculum items.
>
> That's close to $20,000 for each single (eg, Flash) TLF curriculum
item.
>
>
> > * developed a content repository to facilitate content development
>
>
> Hm .. ok, a website ..
>
>
> > * maintained extensive consultation networks and collaborative
processes
>
>
> Hm .. how many colleagues reading this have been 'extensively'
consulted?
>
>
> > * developed national standards and specifications ..
>
>
> Hm .. there are already many standards eg, Dublin Core. We need
another?
>
>
> > * and systems to manage licensing and intellectual property for
content.
>
>
> Hm .. so the companies etc paid to produce items sign a release
document.
>
>
> Now, in March, the group put together a document "Sustaining supply of
> content for the digital education revolution. This paper details the
> sustainability of the Ministers' Le at rning Federation initiative beyond
> 2009 to provide content for the digital education revolution." In here
> they put forward a number of options to the government for more
funding.
> These range from $5 million a year, for not very much at all, to over
$16
> million a year for presumably much of the same.
>
>
http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/for_jurisdictions/feasibility_an
d_
> p
> lanning_reports/phase_three.html
>
> Colleagues. Now would be a great time to let people know your
opinions.
>
> Our money, and profession, will be vitally involved Is this good
enough?
>
> Speak up now, or it will assuredly be more of the same. Is it good
enough?
>
> Cheers people
> Stephen Loosley
> Member, Victorian
> Institute of Teaching.
>
>
>
> Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> Year 7 - 10 IT Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
Teachers
> Association Inc
Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
More information about the Yr7-10it
mailing list