[Yr11 Information Technology] unit 2

[Michael Torsello]

Assessing the division of labour is always a complicated matter.
I split the assessment rubric into Group assessment and individual assessment.
The group assessment is assessed on the finished product and is the same grade for each member of the group
Then I look at individual contributions- journals, plans or designs, evaluation reports etc. This grade is individualised for each students.
The weighting of the two parts depends a lot on the task.
________________________________
With thanks,
Michael Torsello
Director of Innovation (eLearning)
[St Francis Xavier College]
PO Box 85, Beaconsfield, VIC 3807
Telephone +61 3 9707 3111
Facsimile +61 3 9707 3601
[St Francis Xavier College]<http://www.sfx.vic.edu.au/>

From: yr11it-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:yr11it-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Bane, Janet A
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012 2:13 PM
To: Year 11 Information Technology Teachers' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Yr11 Information Technology] unit 2


Hi Andrew



With SAC conditions, it is not always possible to have a talking- free zone, particularly when the SAC is over a long period.  Outcome 5, where the kids track their development in programming is one such example - they should be asking questions, helping and interacting with each other.  I monitor the work produced, but mainly assess their journals, testing tables and the ICT career investigation.  I try not to have too many kids investigating the same career, or if they are they are, not sitting together.



In outcome 6, it is a group task, so naturally they have to talk!  I think the biggest problem with this outcome is the division of labour - it always seems that some kids do more than others and its hard to distinguish who has done what when you come to assess it.  On a philosophical level, they should probably all get the same; if someone in the group wasn't working, then it should have been up to the others to put the pressure on.  I think I am going to include some sort of personal diary next time I do this SAC so at least they have to pretend to do something constructive each period!



How do others mark group tasks?  Do you mark each person's contribution separately?  Or do you give all members of the group the same mark, regardless of how much work he/she did?



regards

Janet Bane

Patterson River SC



________________________________
From: yr11it-bounces at edulists.com.au<mailto:yr11it-bounces at edulists.com.au> [yr11it-bounces at edulists.com.au] on behalf of Townsley, Andrew A [townsley.andrew.a at edumail.vic.gov.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012 1:07 PM
To: yr11it at edulists.com.au<mailto:yr11it at edulists.com.au>
Subject: [Yr11 Information Technology] unit 2

Hi,



Just looking over my notes from last year on IT unit 1/2.

IN UNit 2 there is a long assigmnet parts A/B and then a group project , for outcomes 2 & 3.



What I want to know is SAC conditions. I allowed some talking for both SACs for various reasons.

Unit 2 outcome 2 went for about 3 weeks with some sick leave I took.



How do other people handle these conditions as do you allow any talking etc.

It is too easy for students to 'cheat' with these long SACs and group work. They can get an answer at home and not bring the answer in.



LSC

Andrew

Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.

Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.

The contents of this email are confidential. Any unauthorised use of the content is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please advise by reply email immediately and then delete/destroy the email and any printed copies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/yr11it/attachments/20120222/5fac4f04/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20036 bytes
Desc: image001.png
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/yr11it/attachments/20120222/5fac4f04/image001-0001.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12147 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/yr11it/attachments/20120222/5fac4f04/image002-0001.jpg