[Year 12 SofDev] Allocation of SAT Marks to U3O2 and U4O1

[McCleary Scott]

I don't believe that we have the ability to "adjust" scoring for the SAT to compensate for the things you mention.  You shouldn't need to "split" anything.  When results get entered into VASS they get entered as a score out of 10 for each criteria.  So we would need to just mark each criteria out of 10 based on the criteria/rubric that VCAA have provided.

Yes, it means that the entirety of the SAT will be out of 80 instead of 100 but I don't see this as an issue.  I did Informatics the past few years and the SAT was four criteria in unit 3 and four criteria in unit 4, each out of 10, so a total of 80 anyway.  These all got entered individually and there was no adjustment as such.  I'm not sure how you would plan to adjust anything here when each has to get scored out of 10.

Remember that their score for the subject is calculated over the entire year and not just on one assessment or unit.  VCAA have already reduced the weighting of the SAT to account for the removed criteria and have just moved the weighting to the other two SACs that we do.

I would be marking as normal based on the criteria that are left to mark.

-----Original Message-----
From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au> On Behalf Of Simon Dorrat
Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2020 5:18 PM
To: sofdev at edulists.com.au
Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Allocation of SAT Marks to U3O2 and U4O1

Hi,

With the changes to the SAT requirements, with the U3O2 portion of the SAT having 5 performance criteria and the U4O1 portion having only 3, how do we split the marks?

Last year from memory (my first year teaching SD so I may have this wrong) we submitted a mark out of 100 for U3O2 and again for U4O1.  Each had 4 performance criteria so the split between the two was even.

According to the assessment sheet in the amended SAT Admin doc the suggested marking is 10 per PC.  So that means 50 for U3O2 and 30 for U4O1.  How do we adjust?  If we scale up the 3 criteria in U4O1 they become far more heavily weighted.

Another side question, PC2 (development model) is comparatively light on in terms of effort required, yet is suggested to be 10 marks (20% of U3O2).  I presume we can adjust this to allocate more marks to the analysis/design?

Thanks

Simon Dorrat
TEACHER OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES | ROBOTICS AND INNOVATION | MATHEMATICS Bosco Campus
10 Bosco St Chadstone 3148
T +61 3 9807 2644
F +61 3 9888 1289
E  sdorrat at salesian.vic.edu.au
W salesian.vic.edu.au

[https://uploads.salesian.vic.edu.au/images/emailbanner.jpg]<https://www.salesian.vic.edu.au>
________________________________________

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

The information in this email and any attachments is privileged and confidential intended only for the use of the intended recipient. This information remains the property of Salesian College and if you are not the intended recipient please delete this message immediately. The views expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Salesian College unless clearly indicated. Please be advised that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the information is strictly prohibited. Salesian College accepts no responsibility for any viruses this email may contain. This notice should not be removed. If you have received this communication in error, please contact us at welcome at salesian.vic.edu.au<mailto:welcome at salesian.vic.edu.au> .
_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, Subscribe, Unsubscribe IT Software Development Mailing List
[https://www.jpc.vic.edu.au/home/files/Stories/FrontPage/EmailBanner.jpg]<http://www.jpc.vic.edu.au/>
This email and any attachments may be confidential. You must not disclose or use the information in this email if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and all copies. The College does not guarantee that this email is virus or error free. The attached files are provided and may only be used on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting directly or indirectly from the use of the attached files, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not. The content and opinions in this email are not necessarily those of the College.