[Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Tue Jun 5 01:26:34 EDT 2018

Hi Neil,

I think I’ve finally understood your question – specifically the content of the “expected result” box of test 4 of the table.
In this case, I agree that I would expect valid_booking to be True.

Regards,

Chris

From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au> On Behalf Of Bruckner, Neil D
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2018 2:56 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Chris,

This still doesn’t make sense any way that I look at.  If you look at the pseudocode there are only 2 possible actual results:

Valid_booking  = False with Low balance Message

Or

Valid_booking = True with no message.

So how can the expected resulted for Test No. 4 be:

Valid_Booking = False with no message

So therefore I would assume that the testing table is based on the wording above to capture the errors in the pseudocode, the only expected result that should be false is test no. 6.

[cid:image001.png at 01D3FCDF.52732220]

I would like to clarify this for my students, but I can’t clarify it for my own mind yet.

Neil.

From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au>> On Behalf Of Paragreen, Chris J
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2018 2:32 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev at edulists.com.au>>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Hi Neil,

The question explicitly says “… so that this pseudocode is fully tested, …”
Being an exam, there’s no actual program to test, so it really needs to be a desk check of the pseudocode (perhaps presenting the table in the question as a test table was misleading ….). We can’t assume how a developer might have coded the algorithm (correctly or not), otherwise students could make up any perceived coding error instead of focussing on the errors in the logic of the algorithm.

Regards,

Chris

From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au>> On Behalf Of Bruckner, Neil D
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2018 2:14 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev at edulists.com.au>>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Hi Chris,

Thanks for the response, I find this confusing.  I would think the testing table should be based on the written component not on the pseudocode that already has errors in it.  If you go on the written part of the question, they need to have either enough money or have given permission to top up, the key being OR.  The pseudocode has the error of AND, so are the students supposed to create a testing table from faulty pseudocode?  I would think the testing table is developed from the written component, so you then find the errors to answer 8b.

Test No.

account_balance

topup

Excpected Result

Actual Result

4

5
(=5)

False

valid_booking = True
No message

valid_booking = False
Low balance message

The True in light blue above is actually False in the examiners report, which I think is incorrect.  If you have the money to pay the fare then surely it’s a valid booking.

Neil.

From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au>> On Behalf Of Paragreen, Chris J
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2018 2:00 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev at edulists.com.au>>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Hi Neil,

There are two problems with the algorithm described in the pseudocode.
Firstly, it requires top-up to be true, regardless of whether there is enough money to pay for the fare.
Secondly, it requires that the balance must be greater than $5, not greater than or equal to.

Regards,

Chris

From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au>> On Behalf Of Bruckner, Neil D
Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2018 10:03 AM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev at edulists.com.au>>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Can someone take a look at Question 8a in Section C, and either enlighten me or confirm the error.  In test 4 the account balance is 5 and topup False, I would expect the result to be “valid_booking = True”, as there is enough money in the account to pay for the ticket.

Look forward to the replies.

Neil.

From: sofdev <sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au>> On Behalf Of Phillip Donald
Sent: Friday, 1 June 2018 3:54 PM
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <sofdev at edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev at edulists.com.au>>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] 2017 Software Dev Examination Report is out

Multiple choice Q10 was marked as ambiguous. That's great and all but what about critical path question? You know that concept that wasn't examinable that was in the exam...

On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Vella, James <jvella at mackillop.vic.edu.au<mailto:jvella at mackillop.vic.edu.au>> wrote:
The list has been pretty quiet about this (there's usually some robust and healthy discussion around it) but I just noticed that the Examination Report is out on the VCAA website.

Cheers

JV

[Image removed by sender.]

James Vella
Technologies (Digital) Learning Area Leader, Data Analysis Coord
MacKillop College
Russell Street Werribee VIC 3030

T:  +61387345200
F:  +61387345261

webpage<http://www.mackillop.vic.edu.au/>    |    map<https://www.google.com.au/maps/place/MacKillop+Catholic+Regional+College/@-37.898495,144.667368,14z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x86ef7579bb65ae76?hl=en>

Please consider the environment before printing.

________________________________
This email was scanned by Bitdefender

_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, Subscribe, Unsubscribe
IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html
http://www.vitta.org.au  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
http://www.swinburne.edu.au/ict/schools - Swinburne University

IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.

IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20180605/1b7e5c8c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 43667 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20180605/1b7e5c8c/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20180605/1b7e5c8c/attachment-0001.jpg>