[Year 12 SofDev] Fwd: The draft study design is on the table!

[Bell, Kenneth C]

Loved this little soapbox from Mark but it did have a lot of truth to it.

Frustrated with the content if ITA, I moved to Software Development a couple of years ago.

It is great subject and generally much more interesting than ITA.

Reading the draft Study Design, I certainly won’t be drifting back to “Informatics”.

I encourage everyone to read the draft study design and give their feedback.

My classroom got a stack of past IT class sets which we have to purchase after every new study design is issued. I used to look at the panels to see how many textbook authors were on the panel. I only hope that changes to the study design are for the right reasons.


Read the draft - http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/ComputingSD-consultation-draft.pdf

Read the Summary of changes - http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/VCE_InfoTech_summary_changes.doc

Go here and say something -  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25

Ken Bell
Mortlake College




From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Mark
Sent: Monday, 12 May 2014 4:21 PM
To: Year 11 Information Technology Teachers' Mailing List; Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List; Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing List
Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Fwd: The draft study design is on the table!

Psst. Hey, you. Yes, you. The IT teacher.
But mainly you - the ITA teacher.

Remember that feedback on the draft IT study design stops on 17 May. See below for quick links.
Five days to go.

If you teach ITA and you love the idea of teaching databases for most of the year in Informatics, you need do nothing.

But here's a hypothesis...

- If you do nothing you won't end up teaching databases for most of the year. Yay! What?
- This is because when students hear that 'Informatics' == 'Databases', none of them will enrol for it.
- You will be teaching Woodwork. Or two Year 9 Health classes instead.

Of course, that's just a hypothesis. But sharpen your chisels and unwrap your condoms - just in case.

We know that IT Applications enrolments have been trending down for the past 5 years.
And I'd suggest this largely because databases have been mandated for the past 5 years in ITA.
And the new Informatics course wants to compound the injury by increasing the database component.

Dammit, people. We've always had an understanding:
- Software Development has always been for the unashamed IT lover who would watch "The Big Bang Theory" and laugh at the quantum physics jokes.I know I do.
- ITA (formerly IPM - Information Processing and Management) was for - let's be honest - the students who liked using computers but couldn't get into Media Studies. It was a fun, easy subject with low skill expectations on arrival, and a useful skill set on graduation.  It was marked down as a VCE study, but everyone knew that and accepted that. It was understood.

The draft study design seems to want to make ITA an ultrageeknerd study, chockablock with pure database science...the sort of study that would not be "marked down" and would stand proudly against a "real science" like physics or chemistry.

But is that what Informatics is supposed to be? A rigorous, intellectually-demanding, highly academic investigation of esoteric theory that tertiary graduates require for a career in a narrow corner of the IT industry? If so, it destroys the attraction of a subject for general ICT skill development.

VCE Maths has all sorts of streams for students who (1) want to get through year 12  and (2) want to become a maths/science professional.
Why can't VCE IT do the same, as it has always done?

Let's retain a unit 3/4 IT subject for those who couldn't give a flying fuschia for fancy further specialist studies. How many students would choose VCE Biology units 3 and 4 if three of the four outcomes were on cellular slime mould, and the other one was on everything else?

These lists have been a whistling desert breeze, a lonely rolling tumbleweed of discussion on the crucial issue of this draft IT study design.

- Are people passionately in favour of increased database content in ITA and are silent in anticipation of its arrival? (Yay! More databases!)
- Are people writing passionate feedback in defence or defiance of the draft to the VCAA survey<http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25>, and are silent here?
- Are people just passively waiting to be fed whatever VCAA pushes into their cages, and quietly grumble "I don't like that much" for the next 5 years?

Your only chance is now.
And you have only five days.

If you have an opinion express it here on the Edulist forums as well as on the VCAA survey site<http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25>.
You might inspire others to think and respond.

But I don't have to worry.
- I have the beach, red wine, and a thousand fine (and bad) old movies to amuse me during periods 3 and 4 on a Tuesday.
- You will have year 12 Informatics with yet another database outcome coming up, and the kids still don't really understand how 2NF differs from 3NF even after your eleven prior attempts to explain it, even with your hand puppets.

So, if you teach VCE IT...

Read the draft - http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/ComputingSD-consultation-draft.pdf

Read the Summary of changes - http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/VCE_InfoTech_summary_changes.doc

But for Dog's sake, whether you agree with me or not, go here and say something -  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25

Otherwise, you know what the next 5 years will be like for you: Countersinks. Chlamydia...

--
Mark Kelly (amateur troublemaker)
mark AT vceit DOT com
http://vceit.com

Everything new draft study design is a chance to make the VCE world a better place. - Mark Kelly

--

Mark Kelly
mark AT vceit DOT com
http://vceit.com


Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20140514/16426f0b/attachment-0001.html