[Year 12 SofDev] Software development key knowledge

[Christophersen, Paula P]

Dear colleagues

 

I write for two reasons - to discuss the key knowledge point in U3O1
'purposes and functions of the physical layer (Layer 1) of the OSI and
the relationship of the physical layer to the TCP/IP model' and to
apologise to Andrew Shortell and this community.

 

Key knowledge - why layer 1 and its relationship to the TCP/IP model

I certainly appreciate that everyone wants to do the best for their
students, hence the need for further discussion about this KK. I hope
that the following information helps.

*          The physical layer KK needs to be read in the context of the
KK 'a brief overview of the concept of the OSI model for network
protocols'. It is important that students have an overview of the entire
OSI model and how this connects to the TCP/IP model. 

*          The physical layer was selected for a number of reasons
including the need to restrict the scope of the OSI due to its
complexity for teaching 

*          As the layers all interact and build upon the functionality
of those below them it is appropriate to begin at the foundation level.

 

Below is an example of how a teacher has approached these two KKs - this
should provide an indication of the depth of treatment.

*          Provide a brief overview of all layers, starting at layer 1

*          Discuss the link between layer 1 and the TCP/IP by 'showing'
how the TCP/IP model is very similar to the OSI model at the physical
layer, and then discussing the movement from layer 1 to the upper layers

*          Discuss network topologies, NICs and hubs and how these
devices aid the transportation of data.

 

I hope that this information contributes to a better understanding of
the two key knowledge points. It is never the intention of the VCAA to
write cryptic study designs - every effort is made to write robust
curriculum documents. Sometimes, however, it's not until the study
design is bedded down that points of clarification arise. If this is the
case, then the VCAA will take appropriate courses of action to clarify
these concerns.  

 

Apology

On a personal note, I wish to apologise to Andrew and other members of
the community who I have offended with my comments. As so eloquently
stated by Kevork problems can arise because of the disjunct between
intention and interpretation. My intention was never to criticise the
community for its informed and vigorous discussions about the study
design - these discussions are always encouraged. I sincerely hope that
my comments do not stifle further conversations. 

 

Please feel free to contact me if you have any further comments or
queries.

 

Regards

Paula   

 

 

Paula Christophersen

ICT Curriculum Manager

VCAA

41 St Andrews Place

EAST MELBOURNE 3002

(03) 9651 4378

 


Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20110311/f41f4367/attachment.html