[Year 12 SofDev] Re: Re: Industry practice - tertiary links
(MarkKelly)
Stephen Digby
digby.stephen.p at edumail.vic.gov.au
Tue Apr 22 12:11:53 EST 2008
Here here !!!
I say again.....
Teachers are NOT curriculum materials developers.
It is the curriculum design authorities responsibility to provide classroom
teaching materials to teachers (preferably with a range of options !).
It is teachers responsibility to understand the content and their students
so that they can use these materials to plan, prep, teach, correct, and
communicate
Inevitably teachers will tweak for their own class and discover
possibilities, alternatives, improvements.
The second responsibility of the curriculum design authority should be to
systematically collect and utilise this field testing to improve the
curriculum design.
Two examples to show how simple these processes are:
- give the curriculum design to all publishers and ask for draft responses
in terms of classroom material support. Choose a single publisher as the
recommended support material for a definite period e.g 3 years so that they
have the chance to profit from their recommended status. Of course, a
recommendation is not a compulsion, and schools may choose not to use the
recommended resources. The likelihood that they be chosen again will of
course depend on the ongoing feedback re. the quality of their resources and
their continued support through the 3 years.
- require all teachers in all govt schools to provide copies of their sac
tasks with a sample answer from the teacher. (No cost. No copyright as the
work is owned by the government). Select the best 50 and publish on line
(No Cost) as exemplars to assist teachers in Year 2.
etc etc etc
====================================================
Stephen Digby, Learning Technology Manager
mailto: <mailto:digby.stephen.p at edumail.vic.gov.au>
digby.stephen.p at edumail.vic.gov.au
Cheltenham Secondary College <http://www.cheltsec.vic.edu.au/>
www.cheltsec.vic.edu.au
Ph: 613 955 55 955 Fx: 9555 8617 Mb: 0431-701-028
====================================================
The other day somebody stole everything in my apartment and replaced it with
an exact replica... When my roommate came home I said, "Roommate, someone
stole everything in our apartment and replaced it with an exact replica." He
looked at me and said, "Do I know you?" Steven Wright
_____
From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
On Behalf Of Russell Quinn
Sent: Monday, 21 April 2008 10:33 AM
To: sofdev at edulists.com.au
Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Re: Re: Industry practice - tertiary links
(MarkKelly)
Hi again,
I am really sorry to be so negative all of the time but I find
this an appalling situation and I cannot stay silent.
What I have been constantly hearing through the mail
is that we have SD teachers who don't know
what to teach and don't know why they are teaching it.
Rest assured, it is not the teaching staff I hold to account.
Consider all of the wasted time, sleep and worry by teaching
staff who should be devoting their time and energy into how to
teach it, preparing great materials and assessing the students work.
Instead we have people running around in circles trying to work
out what to do.
No wonder people are not keen to write their own SAC's.
Apparently the VCAA is quite happy with the status quo.
I look forward to making a positive contribution soon.
Russell Quinn
Mailto: qn at boxhillhs.vic.edu.au
_____
From: sofdev-request at edulists.com.au
Sent: Fri 18/04/2008 10:06 PM
To: sofdev at edulists.com.au
Subject: sofdev Digest, Vol 38, Issue 26
Send sofdev mailing list submissions to
sofdev at edulists.com.au
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/sofdev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sofdev-request at edulists.com.au
You can reach the person managing the list at
sofdev-owner at edulists.com.au
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sofdev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Re: Industry practice - tertiary links (Mark Kelly)
2. RE: Re: Industry practice - tertiary links (Meadows, Roslyn M)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:40:09 +1000
From: Mark Kelly <kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Re: Industry practice - tertiary links
To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"
<sofdev at edulists.com.au>
Message-ID: <48088899.8050808 at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Maybe the first thing to do is to decide what VCE SD is for.
What is it meant to achieve?
Is it meant to be a preparation for tertiary study?
Is it meant to be a skills-based preparation for work?
Is it meant to be a fun 12 months until uni begins?
Is it meant to give hope to kids who are unqualified for any other VCE
subject?
I'm sure the VCAA has a good answer to this. It would be interesting to
hear it. Then, maybe, we can start re-defining SD - and ITA.
That's assuming VCE IT NEEDS to be redefined...
Which is maybe a good place for the review of the VCE IT Study Design to
begin...
And when it does, Paula, I hope it's virtual rather than with meetings
in the city. I'd much rather sit at home with a glass of Cab Sav and
take time to ponder the intricacies of an argument, do research, and
fast-forward through the boring people - rather than commute to the big
smoke and sit with a dozen passionate people all determined to get a
word in edgewise within an hour so no-one's argument can get fully
thought-out, crafted and developed in its entirety.
Oooh! Saint Kilda's winning. Must go...
Russell Quinn wrote:
> The first thing would be inclined to do is throw out all of the
> networking -
> which is totally irrelevant to software development (except to a small and
> select few specialists) and replace it with actual software development.
>
> I also think the obsession with the business models should be downplayed,
> and the scenario's broadened to something far more interesting. After
> all, business
> is just one of the reasons for writing software, and not a very
> interesting one at that.
>
> It appears that students are voting with their feet, and I can see their
> point.
> The only way to plug the leak is to make the courses software based and
> interesting.
>
> Russell Quinn
>
> Mailto: qn at boxhillhs.vic.edu.au <mailto:qn at boxhillhs.vic.edu.au>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* sofdev-request at edulists.com.au
> *Sent:* Fri 18/04/2008 12:00 PM
> *To:* sofdev at edulists.com.au
> *Subject:* sofdev Digest, Vol 38, Issue 24
>
> Send sofdev mailing list submissions to
> sofdev at edulists.com.au
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/sofdev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sofdev-request at edulists.com.au
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sofdev-owner at edulists.com.au
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sofdev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Industry practice - tertiary links (Steven Bird)
> 2. RE: Industry practice - tertiary links (Selina Dennis)
> 3. Re: Industry practice - tertiary links (Mark Kelly)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:00:37 +1000
> From: "Steven Bird" <sb at csse.unimelb.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Industry practice - tertiary links
> To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"
> <sofdev at edulists.com.au>
> Message-ID:
> <97e4e62e0804171400q6bf98a9fq3acd059906fe980 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Timmer-Arends <timmer at melbpc.org.au>
wrote:
>> I have to say that this discussion is heading to Comp Sci circa 1990
(which
>> is not necessarily a bad thing)
>
> Well, CS an obvious source of theory for an IT subject. The theory on
> which VCE Physics and Chemistry is based is older still, but no-one
> considers that dated.
>
>> but it seems to me that a couple of
>> questions need to be answered first:
>> 1. what do we want students to get out of a technically-oriented Y12 IT
course?
>> 2. is the course primarily intended to prepare students for teritary,
work, or both?
>
> Another conceivable answer to q2 is that it is foundational study,
> preparing students for whatever they choose to do in future, even if
> it involves no formal IT study or employment.
>
> For the students continuing from VCE Software Development to a degree
> in Software Engineering, we would prefer students to have a solid
> grounding in algorithmic problem solving and the associated
> programming skills. (The SDLC follows naturally once they're ready to
> scale up.)
>
> -Steven
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:09:16 +1000
> From: "Selina Dennis" <selina at dennis.net.au>
> Subject: RE: [Year 12 SofDev] Industry practice - tertiary links
> To: "'Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List'"
> <sofdev at edulists.com.au>
> Message-ID: <003801c8a0d7$aed8dd80$0c8a9880$@net.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I am both a Year 12 Software Development teacher and a Computer Science
> graduate - I completed my CS degree late in life, circa 2005 - and as
> someone who has worked in the IT industry since 1996, I must say that I
> concur with Steven Bird's view that there is a chasm between secondary
> school teaching of IT and tertiary teaching of IT. For students in Year
12,
> the key components of software development that they will "get the most
out
> of", is the theory behind algorithms, problem solving, and also the
> development of their basic thinking skills. I've been teaching PHP/mySQL
to
> my students this year and while most have come into the course having
> completed Year 10 and 11 IT, they still did not have a basic understanding
> of fundamental programming concepts at the start of the year.
>
> Perhaps this is more of a "theological" discussion on how to teach
> programming to teenagers, but it's also relevant to note that much of the
> theory that is being taught in Year 12 is rarely used or developed in
either
> tertiary study or in industry. One such example is diagrams - N-S
Diagrams,
> DFDs, etc have long been superseded by UML, both at a university level and
> in industry - as an aside, I had never heard of NS diagrams until I had to
> teach it in IPM, and I had worked with ISO-9000 compliant corporations
> developing major software products.
>
> Similarly, the SDLC, as Steven has raised, is most useful for large-scale
> projects. Students will rarely experience the benefit, nor the relevance,
of
> the SDLC, in a secondary school curriculum. More useful theory would be a
> more focused look at iterative design, extreme programming (or any other
> kind of agile software development), etc, and move away from the excessive
> documentation requirements that the SDLC brings to the table.
>
> As a teacher, I would prefer to bring in key aspects of the SDLC without
> having to formally teach every part of it. For example, a concentration on
> testing and debugging of software - this is a twofold benefit, as it
teaches
> students to be aware of how they choose to implement functionality, and
also
> develops their analytical and observational skills when they are debugging
> an error. Bringing in Use Case Diagrams instead of DFDs would be
fantastic,
> also, as it conceptually allows a student to think through what they are
> providing in their system before they develop it.
>
> In general, however, I have to say I am currently much happier with the
core
> content of the Software Development course than I was with the IT:
> Applications course, but I still believe that it is, at its core, dated
and
> at times irrelevant. In a perfect world, we would be teaching our students
> "good practice" programming while also preparing them for a future path in
> IT if they so choose - both at the tertiary level and in industry.
>
> </soapbox>
>
> Regards,
>
> Selina Dennis
> Strathmore Secondary College
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au
[mailto:sofdev-bounces at edulists.com.au]
> On Behalf Of Steven Bird
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 7:01 AM
> To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Industry practice - tertiary links
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Timmer-Arends <timmer at melbpc.org.au>
wrote:
>> I have to say that this discussion is heading to Comp Sci circa 1990
> (which
>> is not necessarily a bad thing)
>
> Well, CS an obvious source of theory for an IT subject. The theory on
> which VCE Physics and Chemistry is based is older still, but no-one
> considers that dated.
>
>> but it seems to me that a couple of
>> questions need to be answered first:
>> 1. what do we want students to get out of a technically-oriented Y12 IT
> course?
>> 2. is the course primarily intended to prepare students for teritary,
> work, or both?
>
> Another conceivable answer to q2 is that it is foundational study,
> preparing students for whatever they choose to do in future, even if
> it involves no formal IT study or employment.
>
> For the students continuing from VCE Software Development to a degree
> in Software Engineering, we would prefer students to have a solid
> grounding in algorithmic problem solving and the associated
> programming skills. (The SDLC follows naturally once they're ready to
> scale up.)
>
> -Steven
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html -
VITTA
> Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:20:04 +1000
> From: Mark Kelly <kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Industry practice - tertiary links
> To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"
> <sofdev at edulists.com.au>
> Message-ID: <4807CD14.8060002 at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Yes - and we have to position VCE against VET, which is the more
> practical, work-oriented stream.
>
> Frankly, I can't see SD being directly useful in providing students with
> workplace skills. It's simply not deep enough in programming skills -
> and it could never be in the time available. And by the time the kids
> took the tram from school to their first job, the entire IT industry
> would have had three technological revolutions in the meantime, so any
> language they learned would have been superseded.
>
> I see SD as giving students a taste of the mindset of software
> development, to be developed later at uni or TAFE.
>
> 2.2c worth, and falling against the Yen.
>
> Timmer-Arends wrote:
>> I have to say that this discussion is heading to Comp Sci circa 1990
(which
>> is not necessarily a bad thing) but it seems to me that a couple of
>> questions need to be answered first:
>> 1. what do we want students to get out of a technically-oriented Y12 IT
>> course?
>> 2. is the course primarily intended to prepare students for teritary,
>> work, or both?
>>
>> Regards
>> Robert T-A
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Bird" <sb at csse.unimelb.edu.au>
>> To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"
>> <sofdev at edulists.com.au>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 10:41 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Industry practice - tertiary links
>>
>>
>>> [Adrian -- thanks for picking a more appropriate subject line now that
>>> discussion has moved away from data flow diagrams.]
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 7:28 PM, andrew barry <jagguy999 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I prefer to just teach an IT subject which is just programming and some
>>>> programming design eg psuedo code.
>>>
>>> I agree. Students should learn how to walk before learning how to
>>> run, i.e. they should be competent with "programming in-the-small"
>>> before they spend much time on "programming in-the-large" (incl SDLC).
>>>
>>>> Including so much theory doesn't get any student excited about learning
>>>> IT
>>>> at Uni. After all we are trying to promote IT beyond yr12 are we not?
>>>> Are
>>>> we
>>>> not trying to get more people to do it?
>>>
>>> I agree with Adrian that rigour is important, and this cuts across
>>> analysis, design, implementation, documentation, etc. The SDLC is one
>>> source of theory but I question its suitability at this level. It's
>>> intended for software engineering projects where you have to manage
>>> whole teams of developers, client relationships, project deliverables,
>>> etc. When students aren't already experienced at small-scale
>>> programming the emphasis often falls on a rather heavy document
>>> process, which has to be one of the least exciting aspects of software
>>> development.
>>>
>>> Another issue I have with the emphasis on SDLC as a major source of
>>> theoretical content is that it focusses too much on the software
>>> development process. Of course that's entirely appropriate given the
>>> title of the subject, but there's some other areas of computing theory
>>> that would be useful and accessible at this level, including
>>> algorithmic problem solving and the limits of computing. Here's a
>>> couple of introductory books that cover these topics in a
>>> non-mathematical yet rigorous and intellectually stimulating way:
>>>
>>> Algorithmics: The Spirit of Computing (3rd Ed, David Harel, Addison
>>> Wesley, 2004)
>>>
>>> Computers Ltd: What They Really Can't Do (David Harel, Oxford
>>> University Press, 2000)
>>>
>>> -Steven Bird
>>> http://www.csse.unimelb.edu.au/~sb/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> http://www.edulists.com.au
>>> IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by
>>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
>>> Authority
>>> and
>>> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html -
>>> VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
>
> --
> Mark Kelly
> Manager - Information Systems
> McKinnon Secondary College
> McKinnon Rd McKinnon 3204, Victoria, Australia
> Direct line / Voicemail: 8520 9085
> School Phone +613 8520 9000
> School Fax +613 95789253
> kel AT mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
>
> Webmaster - http://www.mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
> IT Lecture notes: http://vceit.com
> Moderator: IT Applications Mailing List
>
> A conclusion is the place where you got sick of thinking.
> If you Declare War - is it integer or boolean?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sofdev mailing list
> sofdev at edulists.com.au
> http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/sofdev
>
>
> End of sofdev Digest, Vol 38, Issue 24
> **************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au <http://www.edulists.com.au> IT Software
> Development Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html
> <http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html > -
> Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
> http://www.vitta.org.au <http://www.vitta.org.au> - VITTA Victorian
> Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date:
12/04/2008 11:32 AM
--
Mark Kelly
Manager - Information Systems
McKinnon Secondary College
kel AT mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
McKinnon Rd, McKinnon 3204, Victoria, Australia
Direct line / Voicemail: 8520 9085 Fax +613 9578 9253
Webmaster - http://www.mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
IT Lecture notes: http://vceit.com
Moderator: IT Applications Mailing List
Only those who swim against the current know the current is there.
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:04:52 +1000
From: "Meadows, Roslyn M" <Meadows.Roslyn.M at edumail.vic.gov.au>
Subject: RE: [Year 12 SofDev] Re: Industry practice - tertiary links
To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"
<sofdev at edulists.com.au>
Message-ID:
<93564D1B69FCEC47BB2D847F7B0888DA0187937C at EDUSM03.education.vic.gov.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part
--------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1381 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url :
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20080418/0b541aa2/at
tachment.jpe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1316 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
Url :
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20080418/0b541aa2/at
tachment-0001.jpe
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sofdev mailing list
sofdev at edulists.com.au
http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/sofdev
End of sofdev Digest, Vol 38, Issue 26
**************************************
_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au <http://www.edulists.com.au> IT Software
Development Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vitta.org.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html -
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
http://www.vitta.org.au <http://www.vitta.org.au> - VITTA Victorian
Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20080422/fca6edd3/attachment-0001.html
More information about the sofdev
mailing list