[Opensource] Interactive Electronic Whiteboards
Cameron Bell
bell.cameron.p at edumail.vic.gov.au
Mon Mar 10 13:52:21 EST 2008
I have found that with my senior physics classes I still tend to use it
as a glorified projections system where I could do what I do without the
need of the IWB part. However, I do appreciate the IWB software that
accepts YouTube videos in the native flv format. I can prepare a lesson
ahead of time and just drop the video in. I am also getting better at
using the drawing tools - they let me draw far more accurately.
Where I have found the IWB comes into its own is with Junior classes.
As I desperately try to get away from having the whole class doing the
same activity or listening to me in the old chalk and talk, I have found
that when I can arrange for multiple activities to be occuring, the IWB
is a great activity to supplement the others. I can have a group of
three or four using it, while others may be using the laptops or doing
a practical activity. It works a treat in those situations, however
finding time to create and organise a class structured in this way is
very hard - but when it works it works well.
Roland I know of a school that initially went the Bluetooth tablets way
and have ditched them for more IWB's. I can email you the school
off-list if you want to find out more.
From a FOSS point of view, my concern is wrapping up my lessons in
proprietary IWB software format which I am not happy about and when I
used the Linux version (why we went with Smartboards - they have
Win/Lin/Mac versions) on my R51 Ubuntu, there was an unacceptable lag
between writing on the IWB and it appearing. I had to ditch it in the
end and use the Win side as I couldn't find a solution and simply didn't
have the time to do so. :(
Cameron
Roland Gesthuizen wrote:
> A neighbouring school has IWB's gathering dust as they are used as an
> expensive whiteboard / projection systems. From what I can see, only
> one unit is used effectively by an inspiring teacher who teaches only
> in the same room.
>
> I am typing this post on an Ubuntu Linux desktop (excuse me for being
> a power user). The USB waicom tablet that I loaned from school just
> plugged in and started working. Again, this got me thinking about the
> benefits of a 'touch sensitive' IWB as compared to just using a
> wireless bluetooth enabled mini-keyboard with trackpad / USB port and
> a bluetooth Waicom tablet.
>
> In theory two (or more) sets of these units can be shared amongst
> students and the teacher in a classroom, perhaps one per team of
> students. When necessary or desirable, they can then collaborate,
> annotate on the big screen, all using a portable or existing projector
> system.
>
> This week, I am going to order two sets of these wireless devices for
> a trial. Whilst I am not trying to reproduce the traditional IWB and
> might miss out on some of the "eye candy", the cost saving and
> approach where students can contribute from their team desks is very
> appealing.
>
> What do others think?
>
> Regards Roland
>
> --
> Roland Gesthuizen - ICT Coordinator - Westall Secondary College
> http://www.westallsc.vic.edu.au
>
> "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can
> change the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has."
> --Margaret Mead _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au <http://www.edulists.com.au> - FAQ,
> resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> Open Source Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au <http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au> - Victorian
> Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
> http://www.vitta.org.au <http://www.vitta.org.au> - VITTA Victorian
> Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
More information about the opensource
mailing list