[Year 12 IT Apps] itapps Digest, Vol 111, Issue 10
Elliott, Matthew M
elliott.matthew.m at edumail.vic.gov.au
Mon May 12 18:25:23 EST 2014
Mark,
I agree with everything you said.
I am confused by the chisel and condoms line but I'll let it through to the keeper this time.
I have completed the survey with similar feedback but less creative prose.
Thanks for all the resources you share. I used the Normalisation PowerPoint and it worked a treat.
Matt
________________________________________
From: itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au [itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au] on behalf of itapps-request at edulists.com.au [itapps-request at edulists.com.au]
Sent: Monday, 12 May 2014 5:48 PM
To: itapps at edulists.com.au
Subject: itapps Digest, Vol 111, Issue 10
Send itapps mailing list submissions to
itapps at edulists.com.au
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/itapps
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
itapps-request at edulists.com.au
You can reach the person managing the list at
itapps-owner at edulists.com.au
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of itapps digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Fwd: The draft study design is on the table! (Mark)
2. Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Fwd: The draft study design is on the
table! (Mark)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:20:39 +1000
From: Mark <mark at vceit.com>
Subject: [Year 12 IT Apps] Fwd: The draft study design is on the
table!
To: "Year 11 Information Technology Teachers' Mailing List"
<yr11it at edulists.com.au>, "Year 12 Software Development Teachers'
Mailing List" <sofdev at edulists.com.au>, "Year 12 IT Applications
Teachers' Mailing List" <itapps at edulists.com.au>
Message-ID:
<CACu=8Z0km=AS=VYA5MamGowZBsENbV_JcAg9iEu1PUqr6Xvr5w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Psst. Hey, you. Yes, you. The IT teacher.
But mainly *you* - the *ITA* teacher.
Remember that *feedback on the draft IT study design* stops on *17 May*.
See below for quick links.
Five days to go.
If you teach *ITA* and you love the idea of teaching *databases* for most
of the year in *Informatics*, you need do *nothing*.
But here's a hypothesis...
- If you do nothing you *won't* end up teaching databases for most of the
year. Yay! What?
- This is because when students hear that 'Informatics' == 'Databases',
*none* of them will enrol for it.
- You will be teaching *Woodwork*. Or two *Year 9 Health* classes instead.
Of course, that's just a hypothesis. But sharpen your chisels and unwrap
your condoms - just in case.
We know that *IT Applications* enrolments have been trending down for the
past 5 years.
And I'd suggest this largely because databases have been mandated for the
past 5 years in ITA.
And the new *Informatics* course wants to compound the injury by increasing
the database component.
Dammit, people. We've always had an *understanding:*
- *Software Development* has always been for the unashamed IT lover who
would watch "The Big Bang Theory" and laugh at the quantum physics jokes.I
know I do.
- *ITA* (formerly IPM - Information Processing and Management) was for -
let's be honest - the students who liked using computers but couldn't get
into Media Studies. It was a fun, easy subject with low skill expectations
on arrival, and a useful skill set on graduation. It was marked down as a
VCE study, but everyone knew that and accepted that. It was *understood*.
The draft study design seems to want to make ITA an ultrageeknerd study,
chockablock with *pure database science...*the sort of study that would not
be "marked down" and would stand proudly against a "real science" like
physics or chemistry.
But is that what *Informatics* is supposed to be? A rigorous,
intellectually-demanding, highly academic investigation of esoteric theory
that tertiary graduates require for a career in a narrow corner of the IT
industry? If so, it destroys the attraction of a subject for general ICT
skill development.
VCE Maths has all sorts of streams for students who (1) want to get through
year 12 and (2) want to become a maths/science professional.
Why can't VCE IT do the same, as it has always done?
Let's retain a unit 3/4 IT subject for those who couldn't give a flying
fuschia for fancy further specialist studies. How many students would
choose VCE Biology units 3 and 4 if three of the four outcomes were on
*cellular
slime mould*, and the other one was on *everything else*?
These lists have been a whistling desert breeze, a lonely rolling
tumbleweed of discussion on the crucial issue of this draft IT study design.
- Are people passionately in favour of increased database content in ITA
and are silent in anticipation of its arrival? (Yay! More databases!)
- Are people writing passionate feedback in defence or defiance of the
draft to the VCAA survey <http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25>, and are
silent here?
- Are people just passively waiting to be fed whatever VCAA pushes into
their cages, and quietly grumble "I don't like that much" for the next 5
years?
Your only chance is *now*.
And you have only *five* days.
If you have an opinion *express it here on the Edulist forums* as well as
on the VCAA survey site <http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25>.
You might *inspire others* to think and respond.
But I don't have to worry.
- *I* have the beach, red wine, and a thousand fine (and bad) old movies to
amuse me during periods 3 and 4 on a Tuesday.
*- You *will have year 12 *Informatics* with yet *another* database outcome
coming up, and the kids still don't really understand how 2NF differs from
3NF even after your eleven prior attempts to explain it, even with your
hand puppets.
So, if you teach VCE IT...
Read the draft -
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/ComputingSD-consultation-draft.pdf
Read the Summary of changes -
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/VCE_InfoTech_summary_changes.doc
*But for Dog's sake, whether you agree with me or not, go here and say
something -* http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25
Otherwise, you know what the next 5 years will be like for you:
*Countersinks*. *Chlamydia*...
--
Mark Kelly (amateur troublemaker)
mark AT vceit DOT com
http://vceit.com
*Everything new draft study design is a chance to make the VCE world a
better place. - *Mark Kelly
--
Mark Kelly
mark AT vceit DOT com
http://vceit.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/itapps/attachments/20140512/f8e3acc6/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 17:41:15 +1000
From: Mark <mark at vceit.com>
Subject: Re: [Year 12 IT Apps] [Year 12 SofDev] Fwd: The draft study
design is on the table!
To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"
<sofdev at edulists.com.au>, "Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing
List" <itapps at edulists.com.au>, "Year 11 Information Technology
Teachers' Mailing List" <yr11it at edulists.com.au>
Message-ID:
<CACu=8Z0bLDmUdDEEagsAydbo6enmnrMcnBLCd439mw5yVJDa3A at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks, Stephen, but please elaborate. Thanks for - what?
All we have had so far is evanescent tumbleweeds on this issue... passing
breezes of insubstantial comment that barely raise a millibar of
atmospheric pressure in these turbulent times.
VCAA has proposed *seismic* changes to the philosophy and practice of VCE
IT and these lists (which are probably the main non-VCAA fora of opinion)
have so far largely sat mutely.
We sit like kittens stoically waving our paws in the air at tea time after
we've been told that we will be fed only gherkins from now on.
They (from VCAA) say "Oooh, OK then. No comment from the teaching
community. Fine. Fine. Dat's OK. We must be right, then. Let's publish the
draft then..."
VCAA will rubber-stamp the draft since noone has complained or commented.
They will publish it and *you* will have an OFFICIAL *2016-2020* IT STUDY
DESIGN...
And then the tornado of the new study design hits and the teachers go
"But... but..." when it's too late.
- And you know EXACTLY what the tornado is like. You can *see it coming. *You
have been *told* by the friendly tornado that it is coming.
- It even tells you where and *when* it will land.
- You know that everything will be *canon*. *Immutable*. *Unarguable*. For
*years*.
- But people will still sit in their deckchairs watching it approach, and
say "Well, let's see what happens... hell, just because we're sitting
comfortably in deckchairs in a quiet street in Pamploma on July 14, what
can go wrong?"
This is the only metaphorical tornado that *can* be fought because it
honestly tells you in draft form what it intends to do to you, your school,
your classes, your career... This is the tornado that you *can* and *need
to* tackle.
*You have five days.*
Well, *four* now. It took me quite a few hours and glasses of Cab Merlot to
draft this. I'll charge VCAA separately.
Mark
On 12 May 2014 16:29, Stephen Rosicka <Stephen.Rosicka at galen.vic.edu.au>wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Thanks?
>
> Stephen
>
> From: Mark <mark at vceit.com>
> Reply-To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List <
> sofdev at edulists.com.au>
> Date: Monday, May 12, 2014 at 4:20 PM
> To: Year 11 Information Technology Teachers' Mailing List <
> yr11it at edulists.com.au>, Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing
> List <sofdev at edulists.com.au>, Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing
> List <itapps at edulists.com.au>
> Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Fwd: The draft study design is on the table!
>
> Psst. Hey, you. Yes, you. The IT teacher.
> But mainly *you* - the *ITA* teacher.
>
> Remember that *feedback on the draft IT study design* stops on *17 May*.
> See below for quick links.
> Five days to go.
>
> If you teach *ITA* and you love the idea of teaching *databases* for
> most of the year in *Informatics*, you need do *nothing*.
>
> But here's a hypothesis...
>
> - If you do nothing you *won't* end up teaching databases for most of
> the year. Yay! What?
> - This is because when students hear that 'Informatics' == 'Databases',
> *none* of them will enrol for it.
> - You will be teaching *Woodwork*. Or two *Year 9 Health* classes instead.
>
> Of course, that's just a hypothesis. But sharpen your chisels and unwrap
> your condoms - just in case.
>
> We know that *IT Applications* enrolments have been trending down for
> the past 5 years.
> And I'd suggest this largely because databases have been mandated for the
> past 5 years in ITA.
> And the new *Informatics* course wants to compound the injury by
> increasing the database component.
>
> Dammit, people. We've always had an *understanding:*
> - *Software Development* has always been for the unashamed IT lover who
> would watch "The Big Bang Theory" and laugh at the quantum physics jokes.I
> know I do.
> - *ITA* (formerly IPM - Information Processing and Management) was for -
> let's be honest - the students who liked using computers but couldn't get
> into Media Studies. It was a fun, easy subject with low skill expectations
> on arrival, and a useful skill set on graduation. It was marked down as a
> VCE study, but everyone knew that and accepted that. It was *understood*.
>
> The draft study design seems to want to make ITA an ultrageeknerd study,
> chockablock with *pure database science...*the sort of study that would
> not be "marked down" and would stand proudly against a "real science" like
> physics or chemistry.
>
> But is that what *Informatics* is supposed to be? A rigorous,
> intellectually-demanding, highly academic investigation of esoteric theory
> that tertiary graduates require for a career in a narrow corner of the IT
> industry? If so, it destroys the attraction of a subject for general ICT
> skill development.
>
> VCE Maths has all sorts of streams for students who (1) want to get
> through year 12 and (2) want to become a maths/science professional.
> Why can't VCE IT do the same, as it has always done?
>
> Let's retain a unit 3/4 IT subject for those who couldn't give a flying
> fuschia for fancy further specialist studies. How many students would
> choose VCE Biology units 3 and 4 if three of the four outcomes were on *cellular
> slime mould*, and the other one was on *everything else*?
>
> These lists have been a whistling desert breeze, a lonely rolling
> tumbleweed of discussion on the crucial issue of this draft IT study design.
>
> - Are people passionately in favour of increased database content in ITA
> and are silent in anticipation of its arrival? (Yay! More databases!)
> - Are people writing passionate feedback in defence or defiance of the
> draft to the VCAA survey <http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25>, and are
> silent here?
> - Are people just passively waiting to be fed whatever VCAA pushes into
> their cages, and quietly grumble "I don't like that much" for the next 5
> years?
>
> Your only chance is *now*.
> And you have only *five* days.
>
> If you have an opinion *express it here on the Edulist forums* as well
> as on the VCAA survey site <http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25>.
> You might *inspire others* to think and respond.
>
> But I don't have to worry.
> - *I* have the beach, red wine, and a thousand fine (and bad) old movies
> to amuse me during periods 3 and 4 on a Tuesday.
> *- You *will have year 12 *Informatics* with yet *another* database
> outcome coming up, and the kids still don't really understand how 2NF
> differs from 3NF even after your eleven prior attempts to explain it, even
> with your hand puppets.
>
> So, if you teach VCE IT...
>
> Read the draft -
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/ComputingSD-consultation-draft.pdf
>
> Read the Summary of changes -
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/vce/infotech/VCE_InfoTech_summary_changes.doc
>
> *But for Dog's sake, whether you agree with me or not, go here and say
> something -* http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CRDVJ25
>
> Otherwise, you know what the next 5 years will be like for you:
> *Countersinks*. *Chlamydia*...
>
> --
> Mark Kelly (amateur troublemaker)
> mark AT vceit DOT com
> http://vceit.com
>
> *Everything new draft study design is a chance to make the VCE world a
> better place. - *Mark Kelly
>
> --
>
> Mark Kelly
> mark AT vceit DOT com
> http://vceit.com
>
>
Mark Kelly
mark AT vceit DOT com
http://vceit.com
*Everything that used to be a sin is now a disease - Bill Maher *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/itapps/attachments/20140512/e878d5a7/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
itapps mailing list
itapps at edulists.com.au
http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/itapps
End of itapps Digest, Vol 111, Issue 10
***************************************
Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
More information about the itapps
mailing list