[Year 12 IT Apps] Fwd: VELS and semester reporting - please advise

[Monica Rankin]

Actually twins are not that rare - about 1 in every 70 births is a
multiple  (taken from ABS statistics)
Monica
Mother of twins
Director of Australian Multiple Birth Assoc



-----Original Message-----
From: itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au
[mailto:itapps-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Mark Kelly
Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2007 11:01 AM
To: Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Year 12 IT Apps] Fwd: VELS and semester reporting - please
advise

1.  Blame VELS

2.  Rest assured that there are very few twins so the problem will be 
uncommon .

3.  Blame VELS again

4.  But seriously, folks.  Knowing that an elective could be done in sem

1 or sem 2 should lead teachers to base their progression point on the 
VELS standard for that yearlevel and that semester to keep the domain 
grade sensible.

Year 9 Kid X doing the elective in sem 1 would be judged against the 
standard for sem 1 (e.g. 5.25) and twin Kid Y in sem 2 would be judged 
against the standard for sem 2 (5.5).

That way, their VELS score is balanced against their chronological age.

At least, that's what I'd do as a teacher entering VELS scores.  In fact

I only have VCE this year so it's not an issue except for the fact that 
I'm the bunny writing the database to do our reporting, including VELS. 
  It all works well, but the XML data inport/export is a pain.  I'm 
cheating by using Filemaker to generate the domain scores and Visual 
Basic to turn the data into XML to export to CASES21 :-)


Kevork Krozian wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
>  I hate to do this, but I haven't heard from the reporting list so I
am
> cross posting this for your advice please.
> 
> 
>>>> Kevork Krozian 6/06/2007 10:29 am >>>
> Hi Folks,
> 
>    Consider this dilemma ,
> 
> Students do a compulsory elective of ICT in 1 semester of Year 9 ( or
> Yr 10 for that matter ). All students will do this elective, either in
> Sem 1 or Sem 2. It is the same work for both semesters. Student X does
> Sem 1, student Y does Sem 2.  They are twins.
> 
>  Both attain a progression point of 5.5 . However, student X gets a
> grade of B and student Y gets a grade of C for the same work. So , how
> do we explain this to parents ?  They are both achieving the same ,
yet
> score different grades by the randomness of elective selection and
> different stages ( or ages ) of assessment .
> 
>  How do we reconcile this ?
> 
> Look forward to your replies
> 
> 
> 
> Kevork Krozian
> IT Manager , Forest Hill College
> k.krozian at fhc.vic.edu.au 
> http://www.fhc.vic.edu.au 
> Mobile: 0419 356 034
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> IT Applications Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
Authority and
> http://www.vitta.org.au  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
Teachers Association Inc
> 
> 

-- 
Mark Kelly
Manager - Information Systems
McKinnon Secondary College
McKinnon Rd McKinnon 3204, Victoria, Australia
Direct line: 8520 9085
School Phone +613 8520 9000
School Fax   +613 9578 9253
kel AT mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au

Webmaster - http://www.mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
IT Lecture notes: http://vceit.com
Moderator: ITA Mailing List

"My mother used to say to me,
'In this world you must be O so smart or O so pleasant.'
I recommend pleasant.  You may quote me."  Harvey, 1950.

_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
IT Applications Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
Authority and
http://www.vitta.org.au  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
Teachers Association Inc
#####################################################################################
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom 
it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and 
do not necessarily represent those of Beaconhills College. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that 
any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly 
prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please notify Beaconhills College 
by telephone on (+61 3)  5945 0200.
#####################################################################################