[Year 12 IT Apps] Potts Ch 3 and Study Design
Keith Richardson
keithcr at fastmail.fm
Mon Feb 12 22:43:31 EST 2007
The approach I use (in covering the plethora of stuff to be memorized)
is I DO NOT TEACH IT.
How do I justify that? There is simply too much and lecturing almost all
of the time switches the kids off (IMHO).
Solution - my kids have to make summaries of the chapters (one per
fortnight) plus some scenarios and sample questions. Reward - they are
allowed to take their own summaries into each sac.
So what do I do with class time? Plenty of practical - let them keep
their hands on computers much of the time. Plenty of short sharp
discussions to whet the appetite/enthusiasm, answer some questions they
might have about what they are reading for homework (emphasizing that
the teacher is only one of many resources available to aid learning).
I have a number of videos such as the study of the info system used in
Big W - this provides a wonderful opportunity for them to identify some
of the stuff they are learning as they summarize.
I am not saying mine is the best approach, just that it seems to work OK
for me.
Cheers, Keith
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:35:35 +1100, "Mark Kelly"
<kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au> said:
>
>
> Russell Edwards wrote:
> > Hello list,
>
> Hello Russell.
>
> > I just finished my last set of powerpoint slides for Ch 3 of Potts.
> >
> > I have a few questions; please excuse the naive ones as I am new to
> > teaching.
> >
> > Firstly, I did not expect to be giving lecture-style presentations to
> > secondary students, but in ITA there seems to be so much guff they're
> > expected to memorise with no real practical activity possible to cement
> > it, that lecturing and encouraging revision seems the only way to go. I
> > have been doing 20 mins of theory at the start of each double and then
> > have them go on with practical work (at present, Dreamweaver). Do others
> > follow a similar format for ITA? (The 20 mins looks to be too little
> > actually)
>
> That's why my site is called "IT Lecture Notes" - exploratory learning
> can be great but it chews up classtime. The 'Lecture Tolerance Limit'
> of your kids can vary from year to year, but I mix lectures with
> practice whenever I can.
>
> > Secondly, a few things in the book seem outdated. I'm no network
> > engineer, but it's my understanding that hubs and token ring networks
> > are a thing of the ancient past. Yet, both receive a fair bit of
> > coverage in the Potts book, especially hubs. Likewise, you'd be pretty
> > hard pressed to find anyone still using 10BASE2 these days.
>
> It's funny how conservative IT folk can be. Yes - hubs and coaxial are
> history; so, effectively, are bridges and repeaters. Token Ring is a
> rare oddity.
>
> To save time, I just teach CAT6, switches and Ethernet and basically
> ignore coax, hubs and Token Ring. Be wary with ITA - the depth of
> networking knowledge is way less than it was in IPM: no topologies or
> protocols are needed now. The most technical stuff remaining is cables
> and wireless.
>
> >
> > Thirdly and related, how can I tell *specifically* what things students
> > will need to know for the exam? (Will hubs and token ring nets be in
> > it?) The study design mentions switches and not hubs in the glossary
> > under network architecture, and bus, star and hybrid, not ring, under
> > network topologies. Does that mean they're guaranteed not to be on the
> > exam? It seems fairly tricky for teachers and students with a brand new
> > study design and no past exams to go by.
>
> If a key knowledge dotpoint or the glossary says "including X,Y and Z"
> it means that X,Y and Z are examinable.
> If it says "for example", it is just an example to clarify what is
> intended by a point.
>
> No topologies are listed in U3O2 key knowledge so could not be justified
> as examinable. Topologies and protocols belong in Software Development
> now.
>
> >
> > Fourthly, the approach taken to network communications standards and
> > transmission media both in Potts and in the study design seems a bit of
> > a dog's breakfast, i.e. there is no concept of layers. Readers won't
> > know that IP runs on top of a data link layer protocol like the data
> > layers of ethernet or 802.11, that TCP runs on top of IP and so does
> > UDP, etc etc. I can't see how they're supposed to know what the random
> > bits and pieces they are exposed to are for and how they fit together if
> > they're not given the big picture.
>
> Fear not. Such complexities are irrelevant for ITA.
>
> > Is that a fair comment? So, in my slides I am presenting the TCP/IP
> > five-layer network model: physical, data, network, transport,
> > application. I will then go on and cover all the bits mentioned in the
> > book plus a few more examples for clarity, but all in the context of the
> > layers. Students will be told that they only need to know what's in the
> > book but that the five-layer model is a good way to learn it.
>
> None of that is needed for IPM. Just stick to the study design. Don't
> overcomplicate things: IPM students are FAR from technical geniuses :-)
>
> > Thanks in advance for any input I can get
> >
> > Russell Edwards
> > Whittlesea Secondary College
>
> --
> Mark Kelly
> Manager - Information Systems
> McKinnon Secondary College
> McKinnon Rd McKinnon 3204, Victoria, Australia
> Direct line / Voicemail: 8520 9085
> School Phone +613 8520 9000
> School Fax +613 95789253
>
> Webmaster - http://www.mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
> IT Lecture notes: http://vceit.com
> Moderator: IPM Mailing List
>
> There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary
> and those who don't.
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> IT Applications Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
> Authority and
> http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
> Teachers Association Inc
Keith Richardson
ITA List Moderator
Head of ICT, Leibler Yavneh College
Elsternwick
Ph: 03.9528.4911
k.richardson at yavneh.vic.edu.au
More information about the itapps
mailing list