[Year 12 Its] 2006 exam post mortem
Robert Hind
robert at yinnar.com
Mon Nov 13 17:35:20 EST 2006
Don't be so picky!
Yes you can mix and match but
The definitions are quite simple and clear.
Direct: you do it all at once, in with the new and out with the old (but of
course you have tried it out first somewhere - pilot?)
Parallel: you keep the old system going alongside the new system while any
problems are sorted out
Phased: you bring in the new system a bit at a time - let's try the new data
entry module - ok that works well then let's try . . . .
Pilot: you try it one in one location first and the if that works, you
implement in all locations (either direct or parallel) and maybe your pilot
is direct, parallel or phased.
"Life wasn't meant to be easy."
Robert Hind (Semi-retired)
Ex Traralgon and Ashwood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Kelly" <kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au>
To: "Year 12 Information Technology Systems Teachers' Mailing List"
<is at edulists.com.au>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Year 12 Its] 2006 exam post mortem
> Hi David. I always tell my kids in IPM that pilot and parallel are not
> actually implementation strategies: they are optional extras. You can mix
> & match the strategies. e.g. pilot, then parallel, then direct or phased.
> But yes, neither pilot nor parallel achieves much by themselves.
>
> David Dawson wrote:
>> Thanks Mark and Kevork for making this exam more easily understood.
>> The only thing I might add to this discussion is for the implementation
>> strategy mentioned in Section B Qn 13.
>> It would seem from the question that the desired answer is "pilot".
>> However, when you think about it IMHO a pilot is not an "implementation
>> strategy" as after it is tested it still needs to be implemented - and
>> if it is used in a small section of a network and then expanded
>> throughout - then it is indistinguishable from "phased implementation".
>> (I might be shaking the foundations here a little.)
>> If a pilot was trialled outside of the system - as a much smaller system
>> - it could still be implemented in the real world using a "direct
>> cutover" - or in theory, it could be applied in parallel across the
>> system - hence it could be "parallel" conversion. Or it can be expanded
>> from use in a part of the system - "phased".
>> There is nothing in utilising a pilot that determines 'implementation',
>> I feel.
>> So IMO the answer in this case should probably be either "pilot" or
>> "phased" depending on student descriptions.
>> David Dawson
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.edulists.com.au
>> IT Systems Mailing List kindly supported by
>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
>> Authority and
>> http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
>> Teachers Association Inc
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mark Kelly
> Manager - Information Systems
> McKinnon Secondary College
> McKinnon Rd McKinnon 3204, Victoria, Australia
> Direct line / Voicemail: 8520 9085
> School Phone +613 8520 9000 << new number!
> School Fax +613 9578 9253
>
> Webmaster - http://www.mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
> IPM Lecture notes: http://vceit.com
> Moderator: IPM Mailing List
>
> Doctor - We must all face reality sooner or later.
> Dowd - I wrestled with reality for 35 years, doctor, and I'm happy to
> say I won out over it. ('Harvey', 1950)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au
> IT Systems Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> and
> http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers
> Association Inc
>
More information about the is
mailing list