[Year 12 Its] RE: A radical approach to the course

Thu Mar 30 09:46:36 EST 2006

G'day Kevork, Andrew and everybody else that commented..

You have me shaking in my boots!

This "thinking" represents a huge shift in the way I was to approach Information Systems.

Better explain myself here, I'm a new Graduate I.S Teacher. Along with my mentor, (who has been a fantastic help - I feel like a first year apprentice again; save for the carrying of the toolbox!!:-) I am tackling I.S for the first time.

My students - all 11 - aspire to a good study score. So, Kevork makes a good point, why spend too much time on SAC's, when the real meat & potatoes is the EXAM.

I like Andrew's description. If that is what it's like, I must agree with his assertions - particularly Practice exams, Practice exams, & more Practice exams!!

This in turn is exactly the way it's done at University - well it was 2 years ago when I did my U/G in Information Systems. What struck me the most when I moved from the "trade" to "academia" was that there was little/no hands-on; exactly the opposite of my trade (Electrical/data cabling)So, entering an exam for the first time at Uni, and being faced with a paper, and *writing* on paper all of my programs, etc, instead of actually "doing" was a big shock for me...

Now the penny further drops. This is the way I must prepare my students - if they want a red hot go at getting a spot at University. Sadly, I am not preparing my students for Industry, but to get a spot in University....

Slabs of theory. 

Practice exams. 

*Sigh* 

Cheers,

YMMV, etc..

Laurie Muscat.

Bellarine Secondary College.
Mug Graduate IT Teacher.
Drysdale Campus.
muscat.laurie.j at edumail.vic.gov.au

-----Original Message-----
From: is-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of is-request at edulists.com.au
Sent: Wed 3/29/2006 10:56 PM
To: is at edulists.com.au
Subject: is Digest, Vol 13, Issue 10

Send is mailing list submissions to
	is at edulists.com.au

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/is
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	is-request at edulists.com.au

You can reach the person managing the list at
	is-owner at edulists.com.au

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of is digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. RE: A radical approach to the course (Andrew Shortell)
   2. Re: A radical approach to the course (Robert Timmer-Arends)
   3. Re: A radical approach to the course (Jack Matthews)
   4. RE: A radical approach to the course (Frank Merlino)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:42:54 +1000
From: "Andrew Shortell" <a.shortell at braemar.vic.edu.au>
Subject: RE: [Year 12 Its] A radical approach to the course
To: "Year 12 Information Technology Systems Teachers' Mailing List"
	<is at edulists.com.au>
Message-ID:
	<33AA3D688F19FC45900EEE957F551F85371656 at exchangesvr.braemar.vic.edu.au>

Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

Hi Kevork

That approach works well
I have always taken the attitude that the IS exam is often the student's
last exam so all study for it is left until after any other exams and
then they have generally lost the urge (to do anything at all)

So in the first week of the year we look at the exam from last year as a
class , in class time and explain what was answered well and poorly. If
anyone knows the answers to any questions that is great but then I
remind them that they must refer to the case study and award their
answer zero because they don't.
Thus from week one they are reminded to refer to the case study.
Then when we intro the SDLC I explain that this is question one in part
b. Then I say that we have already covered a lot of section a and are
moving along.!!

Then practice exams after the SAC 3  (u3o3) in that dreadful time slot
between the midyear exams and the "break from scheduled classes" ( -
after all yr 12 get the mother of all holidays in November!!).

I aim to finish all SACs and theory by the 3rd last week of term 3. Then
nearly every double is a practice exam in class time. Even though a
double only goes 90 minutes most of them learn to pace themselves
through the exam (2 doubles per week 3 weeks in term 3 and 3 weeks in
term 4 = 12 exams.)  Then I give them solutions to each, they take them
home, read, analyse, come back to the next class and ask whether their
answer would get any marks and we analyse the more difficult questions
as a group.

There are still plenty of other practice exams and I send these home for
weekend work and "break from scheduled classes work" (see mother of all
holidays comment above).

Not every student makes a lot of effort -- sadly for me and for them but
it works better than hoping they will practice without me standing over
them!!.

Also the double in which they are doing the exam I will go through and
mark the last one for questions.  Note that I do not correct -- just
mark which is a lot faster. Thus you can do 15  in the ninety minutes --
that is six minutes each -- more than enough to see if they have
referred to the case study and just giving a quick mark. If they want to
know why then that is part of the discussion class!

In a class of say 20 I would get maybe 14 do this seriously. The others
realise (eventually) that they are being left behind and either do
something about it or prepare for a not so good mark. It can be a good
time to contact parents and voice one's concern about their exam
preparation!

Most teachers of other subjects do not begin exam prep until term 4 so
my students have had three weeks (minimum) of preparation without
distraction.  (ROFL)
SACs in other subjects are the biggest problems - students prioritise to
them quite often.

Remember that with stat mod'n the class competes for their position on
the class ladder but for the exam they work as a group to bring up the
low performers and to raise the high performers so everyone needs to
encourage the low performers to work harder and support the high
performers so that they achieve well.

{    ;-) falls off soap box and staggers off to try to make these ideas
actually work }

Andrew Shortell
Braemar College 

-----Original Message-----
From: is-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:is-bounces at edulists.com.au] On
Behalf Of Kevork Krozian
Sent: Wednesday, 29 March 2006 9:39 AM
To: is at edulists.com.au
Subject: [Year 12 Its] A radical approach to the course

Hi Folks,

     Call me crazy but I am going to do things differently this year.

 I have been frustrated for some time with the fact my students always
do worse in exams than in SACs. Exam prep is always crammed into the 2
-3 weeks of term 4 ( maybe 10 periods in total ) and despite the fact
there are at least 6 exams for each past year as practice ( VCAA, 3 x
VITTA practice, IARTV, Chem Associates ) times at least 10 years = 60
exams the results don't seem to quite reach  expectations.  I am sure
this is due to the huge cram that goes on with other subjects as well
and students may only actually do about 5 or so exams as their real
practice and really, how much one on one do the students really get with
each teacher ?

  So this year we are going to spend 3 weeks in each of Term 2, 3 and 4
= 12 weeks on exam preparation by doing exams in class and marking in
class and recording student performance and progress. What we lose in
time for SACs, theory and programming, we will trim and cram these
rather than the exam.

  I'll let you know how it goes after the results come out in December.

Best Wishes

Kevork Krozian
IT Manager , Forest Hill College
k.krozian at fhc.vic.edu.au
http://www.fhc.vic.edu.au
Mobile: 0419 356 034

Important - 
This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education & Training.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6945 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/is/attachments/20060330/51036a03/attachment.bin