[Year 12 Its] PHP and Software Development 2007
Ken Griffiths
keng at ozonline.com.au
Mon Aug 7 23:49:49 EST 2006
I hear what you're saying, Con and Graham, but I am still uneasy.
I'd like to probe the _intentions_ behind the u3o2 requirement "to produce
a software module suitable for
implementation on a portable computing device" . BTW I just did a word
search for 'portable' on the earlier pdf draft of the new study design and
found nothing.
Is it a late addition? It would seem to me to be a move in sympathy with
young people's enthusiasm for mobile phones and the industry trend toward
portable-pc style PDAs/phones (though these are less popular than phones).
To just interpret the new requirement as a localhost testing server
environment seems a weak response to the intention. Cos what works on a
laptop wouldn't work so well on a PDA. Surely your module would be expected
to be testable on a PDA? And I now notice that u4o1 requires the same
language as u3o2.
The on-line footy comp would't be on-line if it were on a mobile device,
would it? (For a start, mobiles are off-line from time to time)
Googling didn't find me any users of PDA Apache/php. Far more obvious were
references to maintaining your site with a PDA. Anyway, uploading data from
a portable is the current growth area. Surely the VCAA 'portable' idea
wasn't to move away from networking?
[I've _done_ that classroom setup of individual Apache/MySQL localhosts.
This year I'm using a student server box remote in the LAN, and SQLite with
PDO calls. (SQLite is excellent for all student purposes. I've successfully
ported all the MYSQL I've wanted to, to SQLite). I had thought of
presenting _this_ to colleagues until I read the new study design
'portable' clause]
Do we go back to Java?
Ken Griffiths
Deer Park SC
More information about the is
mailing list