[Year 12 IPM] OT VELs auditing of courses
Mark Kelly
kel at mckinnonsc.vic.edu.au
Thu Aug 17 16:47:05 EST 2006
A friend of mine is firmly of the belief that we should do as little as
possible (while remaining officially compliant) re. VELS, including
reporting, in the belief that it is a transient political imperative
that will evaporate within one funding cycle and normal educational
services will be resumed thereafter.
e.g. VELS is a Victorian reaction to Commonwealth educational funding
pressures. If Victoria does not comply, it loses funding. So the state
government has to comply, so we state schools do too.
Of course this friend is not always mentally stable, but nevertheless
tends to survive quite nicely over extended politico-pedagogic regimes.
"Consider Ministerial Paper 6, Schools of the Future, CSF, CSF2, Charter
Priorities et cetera," he/she said. "You just have to learn and use the
new jargon of each regime and continue with business as usual. Easy peasy."
Of course there have been reasonable and inspiring developments in
educational theory in the past 2 decades, he/she adds, such as the
concepts of mixed ability classrooms and multiple intelligences... and
such things are to be valued if we professionals can see that they make
sense and are actually valuable in educating students.
But he/she resists the demands to inhale, digest and suffocate beneath
the weight of the latest educational theorist who needs to get
published, or politician who needs a scrotal grab for the next election.
My friend believes that we professionals know best how to teach and
report and that all other things - including educational bling - will
pass. But (he/she says) we all need to talk the talk, and toe the line
to get our special project funding, our annual increments and our
promotions.
This person is, of course, politically incorrect and terribly
insensitive to the needs of parents, students and the wider school
community.
I have often chided this person for perceived cynicism and reluctance to
embrace holistic innovative pedagogies, but he/she usually replies in
words of one syllable and 4 letters.
I don't always agree with my friend's approach. I can see how new
educational theory has led us away from corporal punishment and rote
learning.
Perhaps VELS really is a better approach to education than CSF. But
there will still be people asking why kids can't spell or add up.
I say that there were *always* kids who couldn't spell or add up, but
there are actually far fewer of them now than there were 100 years ago.
100 years ago, the failures left school and milked cows. Only 3.6% [a
random and impressive statistic] reached year 12 and went on to university.
I tell my friend: Nowadays, kids need a lot more than spelling and
adding up. They need new skills and VELS tries to address this need.
My friend and I have many long arguments. We never agree - fortunately.
And in response to your original question, no. Sorry. Neither I nor my
friend has any audited course or template.
Ed wrote:
> We at DSC need to audit our 7-9 courses against VELs, mind numbing task
> but considered necessary. Has anyone out there a course that is linked
> to VELs or do we all teach off the top of our heads like I often do. Any
> audited course or templates would be appreciated.
>
> ED
>
--
Mark Kelly and Friend.
McKinnon Secondary College
IPM Mailing List Moderator
IPM notes: http://vceit.com
More information about the ipm
mailing list