[Year 12 IPM] RE: MC Q4
Murray O.
murrao at westbourne.vic.edu.au
Thu Nov 10 12:50:16 EST 2005
C as template = consistency and printout = quality
Regards,
Oliver Murray
Web Developer
Westbourne Grammar School
www.westbournegrammar.com
_____
From: Mark Scott [mailto:msc at staff.luther.vic.edu.au]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2005 11:36 AM
To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
Teachers'Mailing List
Subject: [Year 12 IPM] RE: 2005 Exam
Anybody like to suggest what the correct response for MC Q4 was?
Mark Scott
Luther College
_____
From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au] On
Behalf Of Mark Scott
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 6:40
To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
Teachers'MailingList
Subject: 2005 Exam
A few comments:
Multi-guess section
Q4 I will be interested in what people thought was the correct response (I'm
still not sure)
Q16 and Q8 both examples of IPM-speak not used in the real world (a waste of
time and energy?)
Q5 will confuse lots of students. Is this the way to get a spread of marks?
Q20 will challenge those students who are mathematically challenged.
Short answer section
Q8 will be easy for the boys, harder for the girls. What happened to equal
opportunity?
Q2 most will get wrong because they will miss one word "design". Is this a
fair question? Are we testing their IT knowledge or their comprehension
skills?
Q1 I wonder whether "Not printing passwords on coffee cups" is an acceptable
response.
Q11 I loved the case study
Q11c I suppose an acceptable response would be that this would eat into
class time and effect student learning.
BUT would our over worked stressed out teachers really be unhappy?
Q11e The real world would suggest a number of correct responses. Another
example of IPM-speak that don't reflect the real world.
Q12b (ii) A tiny little box to describe an appropriate strategy for the
ergonomic requirements for users. Most organisations have booklets pages and
pages long dedicated to this.
Overall
Too easy and no (or hardly any) sign of project management, networks,
network topologies, GANNT charts, PERT charts etc
Will wait with interest for the results (dec 12?) and the examiners report
next year.
Mark Scott
Luther College
_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au <http://www.edulists.com.au> - FAQ, resources,
subscribe, unsubscribe
IPM Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au <http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au> - Victorian
Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
http://www.vitta.org.au <http://www.vitta.org.au> - VITTA Victorian
Information Technology Teachers Association Inc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/ipm/attachments/20051110/12f6dbe0/attachment-0001.html
More information about the ipm
mailing list