[Year 12 IPM] Fed Govt review of copyright & 'fair use'

Mon May 30 19:59:44 EST 2005

Cool, I shall spread the word on my Blog :-)

http://www.livejournal.com/users/plakboek 

Thanks Keith..

Regards Roland

PS: ... just bloody busy with sooooooo many things. Time to go home after
another late night at the school. Sounds like we lost one e-mail in the
e-mail relay we just had, we should chat about some of your course ideas
etc.

--
Roland Gesthuizen - eLearning Coordinator - Westall Secondary College 
http://www.westallsc.vic.edu.au

-----Original Message-----
From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au [mailto:ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au] On
Behalf Of Keith Richardson
Sent: Saturday, 28 May 2005 11:51 AM
To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
Teachers'Mailing List; List IS; List Multi-Media; List Tech; List Yr7-10it
Subject: Re: [Year 12 IPM] Fed Govt review of copyright & 'fair use'

Bill Kerr is a stirrer! And for that I thank him.
Read this quote:
"According to the Brazilian government, for example, Brazil sends close
to $1 billion to the north each year just to pay for software licenses.
So as the Brazilians see it, tongue firmly in cheek, this proprietary
stuff is a bad thing all around--costing the U.S. $1 billion, and Brazil
$1 billion as well.
The obvious solution is to dump the proprietary stuff. So the Brazilian
government is pushing itself and the nation to substitute free software
for proprietary software. As one member of the government said during a
speech at the World Social Forum, "We're against software piracy. We
believe Microsoft's rights should be respected. And the simplest way to
respect their rights is for Brazilians everywhere to switch to free
software."
Impressive stuff eh?
I read it from
http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/06/issue/feature_people.asp?
- the whole 9 pages of it. What began as a quick-scan grew into a 35
minute jaw-dropping experience. I want to go to Brazil to see this for
myself. To experience it.
I am so glad to be living in these turbulent times, because things
happen so quickly, I get the chance to see hundreds of years of change
happening in mere decades.
Thanks Bill. I have exercised the 'freedom' to spread this to the other
lists as well - everyone whose heart is in the 'right' place deserves to
hear it.
Keith

On Fri, 27 May 2005 22:16:04 +0930, "Bill Kerr" <billkerr at gmail.com>
said:
> judging from Philip Ruddock's preamble (I haven't read the whole 52pp
> yet) 
> Australian copyright law hasn't one down the same path as US copyright
> law 
> (yet)
> 
> I recently read Lawrence Lessig's book 'Free Culture' and it rang alarm 
> bells
> http://www.lessig.org/
> Lessig has written 4 books and runs a blog, the issues are extremely 
> relevant to teachers
> Lessig is one of the founders of Creative Commons, important initiative
> IMO
> He is a lawyer, he's not advocating breaking the law, but outlines very 
> clearly how the law is being used (changed) to destroy freedom and 
> creativity through the internet
> 
> current copyright law makes criminals of 20% of americans (43 million)
> and 
> these criminals are being selectively prosecuted to create fear amongst
> the 
> population - mind boggling examples already exist
> 
> The issues he raises involve the whole future of the internet, whether
> the 
> free expression we have taken for granted up until now will continue to 
> exist or be eliminated by code through law
> sorry if this sounds a little alarmist, I'm jsut flagging it for
> discussion, 
> I think it's importatn
> 
> copyright law is meant to be a balance between authors rights and
> releasing 
> material into the public domain after a reasonable time so new creators
> can 
> use it for their own creative purposes
> 
> that balance has now been destroyed by changes in US copyright law due to 
> the powerful lobby groups such as RIAA (Recording Industry Association of 
> America)
> 
> I'd like (and plan) to write a summary of the issues - like everyone else
> I 
> seem to have little spare time at the moment - but will get around to it 
> "one day soon"
> 
> anyone else looking at this issue at the moment, I would like to hear -
> I'm 
> uninformed about the situation in Australia
> 
> -- 
> Bill Kerr
> http://billkerr.blogspot.com/
> http://intranet.woodvillehs.sa.edu.au/kerrbi/index.htm
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/25/05, Donna Benjamin <donna at cc.com.au> wrote:
> > 
> > Thought this looked relevant to you lot.... and maybe worth passing
> > on to Teacher Librarians?
> > 
> > - D.
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/agdhome.nsf/AllDocs/
> > E63BC2D5203F2D29CA256FF8001584D7?OpenDocument
> > 
> > Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions
> > An examination of fair use, fair dealing and other exceptions in the
> > Digital Age
> > Issues Paper - May 2005
> > 
> > 1. Introduction
> > 
> > 1.1 The purpose of this paper is to invite comment on whether the
> > Copyright Act
> > should include a general exception associated with principles of
> > 'fair use' or specific
> > exceptions which would facilitate the public's access to copyright
> > material in the
> > digital environment.
> > 
> > 1.8 Submissions are sought on the issues raised. A number of
> > questions that may
> > be useful in preparing submissions are included at the end of this
> > paper (see section
> > 15). Submissions are requested by 1 July 2005.
> > 
> > 
> > Foreword
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > 
> > The Coalition Government is committed to maintaining an effective and
> > relevant copyright
> > law that achieves an appropriate balance between the rights of
> > copyright owners and
> > reasonable access to copyright material for users.
> > 
> > The Copyright Act 1968 (the 'Copyright Act') gives copyright owners
> > certain exclusive rights
> > to promote creativity and innovation. However, there are also
> > exceptions to these rights
> > which allow others, in various circumstances, to use copyright
> > material without the
> > permission of the copyright owner.
> > 
> > Digital technologies give people great freedom over when and how to
> > use copyright material.
> > New forms of expression, entertainment and public communication are
> > continuing to emerge.
> > These developments in digital technology pose new challenges for the
> > policy balance.
> > 
> > The Government is aware some common personal uses of copyright
> > material infringe
> > copyright. Examples include transferring music from a CD onto an MP3
> > or iPod player or
> > copying a television broadcast to view later. Those engaged in such
> > uses do not believe they
> > are or should be considered copyright pirates.
> > 
> > Many observers believe copyright law should be reformed to reflect
> > public attitudes and
> > practices. Some interest groups feel a copyright balance might be
> > better maintained in a
> > rapidly changing digital environment if the Copyright Act were to
> > include an open-ended 'fair
> > use' exception that would allow the courts to determine whether a
> > particular use of copyright
> > material is 'fair' and should be lawful. Others argue the present
> > specific exceptions in the Act
> > should be amended to make certain uses of copyright material lawful.
> > 
> > For copyright owners, digital technology offers great opportunities.
> > It also poses significant
> > threats, with copyright material now easier than ever to copy.
> > Copyright owners are
> > concerned about increasing copyright piracy and believe it is
> > necessary to exercise closer
> > control over the way their material is used.
> > 
> > I seek submissions on ways of addressing these conflicting views and
> > canvass options in this
> > paper. In particular, I seek views on whether the Copyright Act
> > should include more specific
> > exceptions or a fair use exception which would facilitate the
> > public's access to copyright
> > material.
> > 
> > I appreciate the issues associated with 'fair use' and copyright
> > exceptions, including personal
> > copying, provoke significant debate amongst copyright owners and
> > users. These issues affect
> > many Australians from those recording television programs at home to
> > others who work in
> > Australia's growing copyright industries. These issues should be
> > properly considered.
> > 
> > I encourage those who have a view to make a submission on the options
> > proposed in this
> > paper for reforming the exceptions to copyright and any other options
> > the Government should
> > consider.
> > 
> > Philip Ruddock
> > Attorney-General
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> > IPM Mailing List kindly supported by
> > http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
Authority 
> > and
> > http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
Teachers 
> > Association Inc
> >
Keith Richardson
Leibler Yavneh College
Elsternwick Ph (03)9528 4911
keithcr at fastmail.fm

_______________________________________________
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
IPM Mailing List kindly supported by
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority
and
http://www.vitta.org.au  - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers
Association Inc