[Year 12 IPM] Re: Top Post versus Bottom Post Confusion

Keith Richardson keithcr at fastmail.fm
Tue Dec 6 11:50:35 EST 2005


Top, Top, Top please, only way to go!
Keith
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:31:09 +1100, "Robert Hind"
<hind.robert.m at edumail.vic.gov.au> said:
> MessageYou have my vote in favour of the top posters. I find it annoying
> and time consuming to scroll all the way down a long list of replies to
> find the new message somewhere near the bottom.
> 
> I agree it is a matter of personal preference, there is no "right way".
> 
> So cast your votes folks and then we can hopefully reach a consensus at
> least for this list!
> 
> Robert Hind
> IT/Physics/Maths teacher
> Ashwood College
> hind.robert.m at edumail.vic.gov.au
> robert at yinnar.com
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Meadows, Roslyn M 
>   To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
>   Teachers'Mailing List 
>   Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:17 AM
>   Subject: Top Post versus Bottom Post Confusion (formerly[Year 12 IPM]
>   IPM New to list)
> 
> 
>   Some of us top post, some of us bottom post, in the end we have a
>   garbled conglomeration that you have to scroll down to read, never
>   quite getting the gist of who posted what comments in answer to what.
> 
>   Can we have a vote or whatever, but can we have some CONSISTENCY
>   please??? Personally I prefer top posters, that way I don't need to
>   scroll down to find the last comments, and presuming the thread is of
>   interest I have already read the other posts anyway.
> 
>   Also is it possible that the topic can be renamed when the subject has
>   strayed?
> 
>   Ros Meadows
>   Bentleigh SC
>   9579 1044
>   meadows.roslyn.m at edumail.vic.gov.au
> 
>   Home computers are being called upon to perform many new functions,
>   including the consumption of homework formerly eaten by the dog. 
>   Doug Larson
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of Andrew Grimshaw
>   Sent: Tue 12/6/2005 10:04 AM
>   To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
>   Teachers'MailingList
>   Subject: Re: [Year 12 IPM] IPM New to list
> 
> 
>   The debate is getting lively here!
> 
>   In reply to Ron Lel
> 
>   This is not strictly correct Andrew. While the correction depends on
>   the number of students, the preparation is the same as if it were for 2
>   separate classes. - Preparation is much the same but not less marking.
>   I try to give my students as much feedback on homework tasks etc as
>   possible. The number of students clearly has an impact on this. Also
>   with 25 students I have no time in class to complete any other tasks. I
>   know from experience that in a small class (is my 8 students in maths
>   methods) there are quiet times when one can do prep and marking
> 
>    I would suggest that Robert asks for more than a "small time
>    allowance". If i had 20+ students I would apply for 2 sessions and
>    hope to get 1
> 
>   Bet he doesn't get it though.
> 
>   Andrew Grimshaw
>   Colac College
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: Lel, Ronald A 
>     To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
>     Teachers'MailingList 
>     Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:43 AM
>     Subject: RE: [Year 12 IPM] IPM New to list
> 
> 
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au
>       [mailto:ipm-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Andrew Grimshaw
>       Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 9:35 AM
>       To: Year 12 Information Technology Processing and Management
>       Teachers'MailingList
>       Subject: Re: [Year 12 IPM] IPM New to list
> 
> 
>       Margaret makes a very vaild point here - i would argue that if i
>       have to run a combined course for VCE, where there is a large
>       amount of marking and preparation, then i ought to be given a small
>       time allowance for it. The volume of work does depend on the number
>       of students though - what numbers are we talikng here?
> 
>       Andrew Grimshaw
>       Colac College 
> 
>       Snipped
> 
>       This is not strictly correct Andrew. While the correction depends
>       on the number of students, the preparation is the same as if it
>       were for 2 separate classes. I would suggest that Robert asks for
>       more than a "small time allowance". Bet he doesn't get it though.
> 
>       Ron Lel
>       (President of the Correct Etiquette for  Posting Group)
> 
>     Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
>     received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before
>     opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects.
>     Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the
>     negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly
>     from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to
>     resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions
>     expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily
>     those of the Department of Education &
>     Training._______________________________________________ 
>     http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe 
>     IPM Mailing List kindly supported by 
>     http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
>     Authority and 
>     http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
>     Teachers Association Inc 
> 
> 
>   Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
>   received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before
>   opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects.
>   Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the
>   negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from
>   the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying
>   any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are
>   those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the
>   Department of Education &
>   Training._______________________________________________ 
>   http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe 
>   IPM Mailing List kindly supported by 
>   http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment
>   Authority and 
>   http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology
>   Teachers Association Inc
> 
> 
> Important - 
> This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error,
> please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
> attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
> damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or
> not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files
> our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
> and not necessarily those of the Department of Education & Training.
Keith Richardson
IPM List Moderator
Head of ICT, Leibler Yavneh College
Elsternwick
Ph: 03.9528.4911
k.richardson at yavneh.vic.edu.au



More information about the ipm mailing list