[English] Re: The Learning Federation

[mccurryj at netspace.net.au]

I'm just wondering why these materials are only made available in 'apple' 
dedicated formats and not set up in ways that are accessible using the whole 
range of mp3 players so on.  Are there not more generic formats available? 
Janny McCurry

Quoting stephen at melbpc.org.au:

> Hi all,
> 
> Thank you Stuart, and Rob, and all who replied, for your thoughts.
> 
> Seems to be 'all or nothing' for The Learning Federation. Either it's one
> of a few 'ultimate' Aussie school providers of Learning Objects or a white
> elephant. Now, I don't know, but even with forthcoming web2 resources (well
> done Stuart!) is TLF missing the bus regarding .au ed-resource philosophy?
> 
> For example, seven Aussie Universities have announced they are making
> learning object-like content available, in normal mp3/mp4 format suitable
> for iTunes etc distribution, and any number of universities worlwide are
> doing the same. Australian TLF repositories of current and future world
> university LOs would be :-) Surely then an ultimate Aussie ed-resource!
> 
> Have TLF missed the bus re copywrite concerns, and so not have au-uni LOs?
> 
> I don't know, I've only seen the first half dozen TLF LO examples, made
> available to the public four years or so ago. Apparently like many others
> on this, the main Australian Teacher's emailing list. But, I DO know that
> teachers creating their normal day-to-day class curriculum materials most
> often make the very best LOs ever, anywhere, for Aussie kids!
> 
> If TLF/EdNA does an EduMail/VITTA itapps community thing across all Aussie
> schools, and so offers curriculum ed communities (preferably by email) AND
> a central gateway to current/world-uni/au-teacher-written Learning Objects
> then I believe the TLF would be a world-state-of-the-art gov-ed resource.
> 
> Thank you Stuart for your work with the TLF interpreting gov legislation
> into a visible and viable (if seldom seen:) national-digital-ed-resource.
> 
> Some well-judged further gov legislation might easily make our Aussie TLF
> into a world state-of-the-art ed-community and one-stop school LO resource!
> 
> 
> The Swinburne University media release this week: "Swinburne is one of
> seven universities in Australia and New Zealand to begin using Apple’s
> content distribution system, iTunes U on the iTunes Store.
> 
> iTunes U is currently used by educational institutions in North America
> allowing them to distribute audio and video content for free to students
> and the general public. Users can download the content to their Mac or PC,
> transfer the information to their iPod or MP3 player and listen to or view
> it anytime, anywhere.
> 
> Initially, Swinburne’s presence on iTunes U features cutting-edge research
> conducted at the university, short films produced by students from
> Swinburne’s Film and Television school, previews of stereoscopic 3D movies
> produced by the Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing and
> introductory lectures in public relations writing ..
> 
> The seven Australasian universities now on iTunes U in the iTunes Store
> are the Australian National University, Griffith University, Swinburne
> University of Technology, University of Melbourne, University of New South
> Wales, and the University of Western Australia along with Otago University
> in New Zealand.
> 
> To visit Swinburne on iTunes U, go to http://podcasts.swin.edu.au/itunesu/
> To download the free iTunes software, visit www.apple.com/itunes "
> --
> 
> 
> Our teaching colleague Rob <Costello.Rob.R at edumail.vic.gov.au> writes,
> 
> > I was talking with a professor of education yesterday who wondered if
> > they would cull the large number of obvious duds (he thought his uni had
> > also paid for access to these)
> >
> > He wondered, though, if the motive would be to keep them in - since
> > large number of learning objects would sound better when presented to
> > the funding bodies etc
> >
> > today, I had to leave a class -  I left them going on with a commercial
> > software product, which they love, and which is very successful - as
> > discussed on this list - in a way that I don't think I could have done
> > with those objects
> > (certainly not without some hours filtering through and writing more
> > linking curriculum etc)
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: oz-teachers .. On Behalf Of Tait, Stuart
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2008 5:31 PM
> > > To: Professional community for teachers
> > > Subject: Re: [Oz-teachers] The Learning Federation
> > >
> > > Hi
> > > My name is Stuart Tait from Curriculum Corporation and I have beenwith
> > > The Learning Federation from its inception in 2001. Stephen and other
> > > contributors have raised questions about TLF and I am writing torespond
> > > to some issues that have been raised.
> > >
> > > TLF is a project jointly funded by the Australian Federal government,
> > > each state and territory government and the New Zealand government. It
> > > is managed by Curriculum Corporation.
> > >
> > > Contributors have expressed concern over the cost and value of the
> > > project. By June 2009 there will be over 8500 items of content
> > available
> > > free of charge to approximately 13000 schools across Australia and New
> > > Zealand. The content has been developed primarily for years 1 through
> > to
> > > 10 across the curriculum. Australian and New Zealand Governments have
> > > therefore contributed the equivalent of $2.50 per student per year for
> > > ongoing access to TLF content throughout the compulsory years of a
> > > students schooling. (This assumes an investment of $123mil for
> > > approximately 13000 schools with an average enrolment of 360 students)
> > > This compares favourably to the cost of textbooks or other educational
> > > software.
> > >
> > > To support ongoing development TLF has been asked by governments to
> > seek
> > > licensing contracts overseas. TLF content, therefore, is not available
> > > as open source on the internet. See
> > > http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/licence on licensing TLF
> > > content.
> > >
> > > One of the issues facing Australian education is that the internet is
> > > not free. The cost of download and copyright is the sleeper. The
> > > Copyright Agency Limited (CAL) is responsible for collecting from
> > > education departments payment for the "copying" and use of third party
> > > material. Many teachers would be familiar with annual survey on
> > > photocopying within schools. Currently education departments pay over
> > > $40 mil dollars per year to CAL for photocopying. CAL will also be
> > > managing the Electronic Use Survey where teachers will be asked to
> > > identify websites and digital content they have been using in class.
> > CAL
> > > will collect on behalf of third party providers, a fee negotiated with
> > > departments. This is enshrined within the Copyright Act. Hence,
> > > departments are concerned that with increasing use of digital content,
> > > fees collected by CAL for content accessed by teachers and students on
> > > the internet is likely to exceed the amounts currently collected for
> > > photocopying. Cognizant of this impact on costs to departments (and
> > the
> > > possible flow on to schools) TLF has negotiated all licenses for third
> > > party material and therefore all TLF content is exempt from ongoing
> > > collection by CAL.
> > >
> > > From the outset, TLF has been required by education departments to
> > push
> > > content out to jurisdictions who provide access for teachers within
> > > their own systems. TLF content is therefore stored and managed in
> > > repositories around the states and territories and New Zealand. This
> > > helps to limit download costs to schools by serving content up through
> > > WANs and, in the case of NSW, caching locally at schools. This
> > > distributed system provides greater flexibility for departments and
> > > schools to manage and distribute the content. Schools can further
> > limit
> > > download costs by loading content onto DVDs or school intranets. As a
> > > consequence there are varied ways in which teachers and students can
> > > access the content. See www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/access on how
> > > to access TLF content.
> > >
> > > TLF has worked with education departments to develop specifications to
> > > ensure that there is consistent metadata for searching and browsing
> > and
> > > the way the software behaves for users. Given the content is used
> > within
> > > a range of environments and systems, the specification for metadata is
> > > far broader than the international standard, Dublin Core. This work is
> > > important because it allows departments and schools not to be beholden
> > > to a particular vendor and allow schools to change content management
> > > systems with relative ease. TLF specifications can be viewed at
> > > www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/specifications . Included is a tool
> > > that allows users to check their hardware and operating systems
> > against
> > > the TLF specifications.
> > >
> > > Contributors should be aware that TLF content consists of interactive
> > > learning objects developed or licensed by TLF and digitized resources
> > > sourced from over 26 cultural organisations. These digitized resources
> > > consist of moving image, sound files or text files and have been
> > > supplemented with information that provides teachers relevant
> > background
> > > information to enrich their lessons. These are very open ended
> > > resources.
> > >
> > > An assessment of the quality of TLF content will often depend on the
> > > values people bring with their judgement and suitability for
> > particular
> > > learning purposes remains a decision for teachers. TLF consults with
> > > many teachers and students when developing content. There have been
> > > reviews of the project and TLF has gained international recognition
> > for
> > > quality. See www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/research
> > >
> > > TLF is just one part of exemplary use of ICTs in education. There are
> > > many teachers who are struggling with the array of tools and software
> > > available on the internet and their pedagogical application to
> > teaching
> > > and learning. To these teachers, TLF has opened the door to the
> > digital
> > > world by providing content designed specifically for Australian and
> > New
> > > Zealand education. TLF is currently investigating ways to leverage Web
> > > 2.0 tools and is working with teachers to promote pedagogy which
> > > effectively integrates TLF content with communication and social
> > > community tools. Watch this space.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yours
> > >
> > >
> > > Stuart Tait
> > > General Manager
> > > The Learning Federation
> > > Curriculum Corporation
> > > Phone: +61 3 9207 9630
> > > Mobile: 0405 150 206
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: oz-teachers-bounces at rite.ed.qut.edu.au
> > > [mailto:oz-teachers-bounces at rite.ed.qut.edu.au] On Behalf Of
> > > stephen at melbpc.org.au
> > > Sent: Sunday, 8 June 2008 10:37 PM
> > > To: media at deewr.gov.au; Information
> > > Cc: yr7-10it at edulists.com.au; english at edulists.com.au;
> > > Oz-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au; itapps at edulists.com.au
> > > Subject: Re: [Oz-teachers] The Learning Federation
> > >
> > > The Hon Julia Gillard,
> > > Minister for Education
> > > & Deputy Prime Minister
> > >
> > > Dear Teaching Colleagues,
> > >
> > > Thanks for such thoughtful, professional comments via the four
> > teacher's
> > > email-lists to which this request for information regards TLF was
> > > posted.
> > >
> > > Our governments are, and will, spend scads of money on education
> > matters
> > > for taxpayers (+?) .. and we need to get IT right. Here's what we
> > think:
> > >
> > >
> > http://lists.rite.ed.qut.edu.au/pipermail/oz-teachers/2008-June/date.htm
> > > l
> > >
> > > http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/english/2008-June/date.html
> > >
> > > http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/itapps/2008-June/date.html
> > >
> > > http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/yr7-10it/2008-June/date.html
> > >
> > >
> > > These urls are the four email-list Archives for this important
> > > discussion.
> > >
> > > To assist important future deliberation on education matters, this
> > email
> > > is being sent to our Minister, TLF, the four lists, and also
> > appropriate
> > > others as important information from teachers+ regarding .au
> > > e-education.
> > >
> > > By the way just adding my own thoughts, the best teacher-sharing
> > > resource I have seen in years has been the edulists.com.au IT
> > > Applications (itapps) teacher email list. It's for teachers of the
> > > Victorian Year12 VCE subject.
> > >
> > > 98% of 860 or so Teachers of the VCE IT unit are members, including
> > > State Curriculum managers, professional associations, examiners etc
> > etc.
> > > A high quality, instant-answer, whole-course-sharing, warm and chatty
> > > community.
> > >
> > > The Vic Gov and the relevant professional-association (in this case
> > > VITTA) sponsor edulists.com.au so that free professional it-ed teacher
> > > list email benefits all with wonderful
> > > group-self-help-curriculum-advice-and-support.
> > > And if you want all the resource-downloads everyone creates, join
> > VITTA
> > > :)
> > >
> > > This teacher sharing & support community has worked brilliantly for
> > > years Complex Yr12 IT course requirement tasks etc are developed as a
> > > community when teachers download course items, add to them, and upload
> > > them again.
> > >
> > > All this, an online-expert warm collegiate community and a
> > > treasure-trove of all-top-quality teacher-shared resources if you join
> > > the professional association, for 800+ teachers, and many kids, costs
> > > maybe $2,000 a year.
> > > (possibly one tenth the apparent cost of one single TLF learning
> > > object:-)
> > >
> > > Many thanks to Barbara in the Oz-Teachers Archive for her summary thus
> > > far.
> > >
> > > One thinks we need to examine in close detail all fine collegiate
> > > responses
> > >
> > > Cheers people
> > > Stephen Loosley
> > > Member, Victorian
> > > Institute of Teaching.
> > >
> > > Nb: Announced this week we're spending $32 million on online
> > > edu-curriculum
> > >
> > http://mediacentre.dewr.gov.au/mediacentre/Gillard/Releases/Teachingfort
> > > heD
> > > igitalAge.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Original Email --
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Trying to be as fair as possible, on an important issue.
> > >
> > > What are people's thoughts regarding The Le at rning Federation?
> > >
> > >   http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au
> > >
> > > The group was set up in 2001, by all Ed Ministers for, "developing and
> > > procuring online curriculum content specifically for Australian and
> > New
> > > Zealand curricula, and delivering it for free distribution to schools
> > ...
> > >
> > > The Initiative has delivered a valuable national asset that will
> > > directly support the national curriculum and assessment agenda for
> > > decades to come."
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm .. sounds good. But, their funding runs out next year, by which
> > time
> > > I believe they were meant to be self-funding. But on their website
> > they
> > > have a plan for considerably more *government* funding.
> > >
> > > Ok, so, a fair question is, what has been achieved? Are they worth it?
> > > The answer to this question is crucial, because with a national
> > > curriculum, the Learning Federation products may well be mandatory for
> > > we teachers (?)
> > >
> > > According to my reading of their website they have received  $123
> > > million over the previous seven years. And, in terms of achievements,
> > > they write:
> > >
> > > > By 31 December 2007 the project:
> > > >
> > > > * published over 6300 items of digital content ..
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm, so .. that's $123 million .. divided by 6300 curriculum items.
> > >
> > > That's close to $20,000 for each single (eg, Flash) TLF curriculum
> > item.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > * developed a content repository to facilitate content development
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm .. ok, a website ..
> > >
> > >
> > > > * maintained extensive consultation networks and collaborative
> > > processes
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm .. how many colleagues reading this have been extensively
> > consulted?
> > >
> > >
> > > > * developed national standards and specifications ..
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm .. there are already many standards eg, Dublin Core. We need
> > another?
> > >
> > >
> > > > * and systems to manage licensing and intellectual property for
> > > content.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hm .. so the companies etc paid to produce items sign a release
> > > document.
> > >
> > >
> > > Now, in March, the group put together a document "Sustaining supply of
> > > content for the digital education revolution. This paper details the
> > > sustainability of the Ministers' Le at rning Federation initiative
> > > beyond
> > > 2009 to provide content for the digital education revolution." In here
> > > they put forward a number of options to the government for more
> > funding.
> > > These range from $5 million a year, for not very much at all, to over
> > > $16
> > > million a year for presumably much of the same.
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.thelearningfederation.edu.au/for_jurisdictions/feasibility_an
> > > d_p
> > > lanning_reports/phase_three.html
> > >
> > > Colleagues. Now would be a great time to let people know your
> > opinions.
> > >
> > > Our money, and profession, will be vitally involved  Is this good
> > > enough?
> > >
> > > Speak up now, or it will assuredly be more of the same. Is it good
> > > enough?
> > >
> > > Cheers people
> > > Stephen Loosley
> > > Member, Victorian
> > > Institute of Teaching.
> > > --
> > >
> > > Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > oz-teachers mailing list
> > > oz-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au
> > > http://lists.rite.ed.qut.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/oz-teachers
> >
> > Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
> received in error,
> please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using
> attachments check them
> for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence,
> whether caused by
> the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from
> the use of any
> attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected
> attachments. Any
> representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,
> and not
> necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood
> Development.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > oz-teachers mailing list
> > oz-teachers at rite.ed.qut.edu.au
> > http://lists.rite.ed.qut.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/oz-teachers
> 
> 
> Message sent using MelbPC WebMail Server
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
> VCE English Teachers' Mailing List kindly supported by
> http://www.vate.org.au - Victorian Association for the Teaching of English
> VATE and
> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/english/index.html - Victorian
> Curriculum and Assessment Authority
> 





------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au