[Design and Technology] destech Digest, Vol 147, Issue 4

Sat May 6 17:35:22 AEST 2017

Hi Robyn 
This is the one I have for Leanne
compton.leanne.l at edumail.vic.gov.au
Hope it is current 
Melissa Bell

On 6/5/17, 3:15 pm, "destech-bounces at edulists.com.au on behalf of
destech-request at edulists.com.au" <destech-bounces at edulists.com.au on
behalf of destech-request at edulists.com.au> wrote:

>Send destech mailing list submissions to
>	destech at edulists.com.au
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/destech
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	destech-request at edulists.com.au
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	destech-owner at edulists.com.au
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of destech digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: 2018 study design issue (Robin Panousieris)
>   2. Re: 2018 study design issue (Julie)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 12:41:51 +1000
>From: "Robin Panousieris" <panousieris at bigpond.com>
>Subject: Re: [Design and Technology] 2018 study design issue
>To: "'Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List'"
>	<destech at edulists.com.au>
>Message-ID: <000f01d2c612$50fca010$f2f5e030$@bigpond.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>Hi All, 
>
> 
>
>Does anyone know how to contact Leanne Compt as I can?t find her email
>and I haven?t had much feedback about this issue and am worried that come
>the 2018 exam only the wording in the study design is accepted even if
>there are mistakes in the study design.
>
> 
>
>Thanks in advance 
>
> 
>
>Robin 
>
> 
>
>From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
>[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Lorraine Tran
>Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 6:54 PM
>To: Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [Design and Technology] 2018 study design issue
>
> 
>
>Hi Robin, Lisa and others on the list
>
> 
>
>Yes, I agree that there seems to be a problem with the wording you've
>quoted. But there is also another problem in that the text under the
>heading refers to evaluation criteria that inform the selection of the
>preferred design option as well as being used for the finished product,
>but the dot points only refer to the finished product.
>
> 
>
>Also, we need to keep in mind that the evaluation criteria for the design
>options cannot always be the same as for the final product. You could ask
>about how well a garment fits the end user (for the finished product),
>but not for the design option.
>
> 
>
>Robin...I'm sure that a list of changes to the study design will be
>published in the future. We need to keep an eye out for it and let others
>know when it's available.
>
> 
>
>Regards, Lorraine.
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lisa Walsh
><lisaw at avilacollege.vic.edu.au> wrote:
>
>Oddly phrased. Has to be a typo...should read to 'ensure' and not
>'evaluate' surely!
>
> 
>
>Lisa Walsh
>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>On 30 Apr 2017, at 12:48 pm, Robin Panousieris <panousieris at bigpond.com>
>wrote:
>
>Thanks Lorraine, 
>
> 
>
>I found out via a friend not through this site.  Could teachers please
>read the evaluation criteria and explain to me what the third step
>requires as I just can?t work it out.
>
> 
>
>When the previous study design was modified there was a document
>published that indicated where the changes were.  Has anyone found that
>document ?  Does it exist ?
>
> 
>
>Evaluation criteria
>
>Throughout Units 1 to 4, students develop evaluation criteria from the
>design brief. These criteria are used to inform
>
>and justify the selected design option, and evaluate the success of the
>finished product in relation to solving the
>
>design problem for the end-user/s. Each criterion has four parts:
>
>? a question
>
>? justification and relevance to the design brief
>
>? the process used to evaluate the success of the product
>
>? how the finished product could be tested or checked.
>
> 
>
>Thanks 
>
> 
>
>Robin 
>
> 
>
>From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
>[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Lorraine Tran
>Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:35 PM
>To: Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List
>Subject: [Design and Technology] Study design for implementation in 2018
>
> 
>
>Hi Product Design and Technology teachers
>
> 
>
>Not sure if this has already been noted on this mailing list....
>
> 
>
>The Product Design and Technology Study Design for implementation in 2018
>(accreditation period 2018 - 2022) is now available on the VCAA website at
>
>http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Pages/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.aspx
>
> 
>
>The link to the revised study design can be found at the bottom of the
>Product Design and Technology page.
>
> 
>
>Apologies if you are already aware of the availability of this study
>design on the VCAA website.
>
> 
>
>Regards, Lorraine Tran
>
> 
>
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
>Design and Technology Mailing List kindly supported by
>http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.html  -
>Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
>DATTA Vic - Design and Technology Teachers' Association of Victoria
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
>Design and Technology Mailing List kindly supported by
>http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.html  -
>Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
>DATTA Vic - Design and Technology Teachers' Association of Victoria
>
> 
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/destech/attachments/20170506/5e7c689b
>/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 15:15:08 +1000
>From: Julie <self.delicacy at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [Design and Technology] 2018 study design issue
>To: "Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List"
>	<destech at edulists.com.au>
>Message-ID: <A9100BD9-B453-4A9A-8B61-1574DB7B6BF3 at gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>Send me an email and I will email you her address, my work email is
>Armstrong.julie.j at edumail.vic.gov.au
>
>Julie 
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 6 May 2017, at 12:41 pm, Robin Panousieris <panousieris at bigpond.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>>  
>> Does anyone know how to contact Leanne Compt as I can?t find her email
>>and I haven?t had much feedback about this issue and am worried that
>>come the 2018 exam only the wording in the study design is accepted even
>>if there are mistakes in the study design.
>>  
>> Thanks in advance
>>  
>> Robin
>>  
>> From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
>>[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Lorraine Tran
>> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 6:54 PM
>> To: Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [Design and Technology] 2018 study design issue
>>  
>> Hi Robin, Lisa and others on the list
>>  
>> Yes, I agree that there seems to be a problem with the wording you've
>>quoted. But there is also another problem in that the text under the
>>heading refers to evaluation criteria that inform the selection of the
>>preferred design option as well as being used for the finished product,
>>but the dot points only refer to the finished product.
>>  
>> Also, we need to keep in mind that the evaluation criteria for the
>>design options cannot always be the same as for the final product. You
>>could ask about how well a garment fits the end user (for the finished
>>product), but not for the design option.
>>  
>> Robin...I'm sure that a list of changes to the study design will be
>>published in the future. We need to keep an eye out for it and let
>>others know when it's available.
>>  
>> Regards, Lorraine.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Lisa Walsh
>><lisaw at avilacollege.vic.edu.au> wrote:
>> Oddly phrased. Has to be a typo...should read to 'ensure' and not
>>'evaluate' surely!
>>  
>> Lisa Walsh
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 30 Apr 2017, at 12:48 pm, Robin Panousieris
>><panousieris at bigpond.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Lorraine,
>>  
>> I found out via a friend not through this site.  Could teachers please
>>read the evaluation criteria and explain to me what the third step
>>requires as I just can?t work it out.
>>  
>> When the previous study design was modified there was a document
>>published that indicated where the changes were.  Has anyone found that
>>document ?  Does it exist ?
>>  
>> Evaluation criteria
>> Throughout Units 1 to 4, students develop evaluation criteria from the
>>design brief. These criteria are used to inform
>> and justify the selected design option, and evaluate the success of the
>>finished product in relation to solving the
>> design problem for the end-user/s. Each criterion has four parts:
>> ? a question
>> ? justification and relevance to the design brief
>> ? the process used to evaluate the success of the product
>> ? how the finished product could be tested or checked.
>>  
>> Thanks
>>  
>> Robin
>>  
>> From: destech-bounces at edulists.com.au
>>[mailto:destech-bounces at edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Lorraine Tran
>> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:35 PM
>> To: Design and Technology Teachers' Mailing List
>> Subject: [Design and Technology] Study design for implementation in 2018
>>  
>> Hi Product Design and Technology teachers
>>  
>> Not sure if this has already been noted on this mailing list....
>>  
>> The Product Design and Technology Study Design for implementation in
>>2018 (accreditation period 2018 - 2022) is now available on the VCAA
>>website at
>> 
>>http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Pages/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.aspx
>>  
>> The link to the revised study design can be found at the bottom of the
>>Product Design and Technology page.
>>  
>> Apologies if you are already aware of the availability of this study
>>design on the VCAA website.
>>  
>> Regards, Lorraine Tran
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
>> Design and Technology Mailing List kindly supported by
>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.html  -
>>Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
>> DATTA Vic - Design and Technology Teachers' Association of Victoria
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
>> Design and Technology Mailing List kindly supported by
>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.html  -
>>Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
>> DATTA Vic - Design and Technology Teachers' Association of Victoria
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, resources, subscribe, unsubscribe
>> Design and Technology Mailing List kindly supported by
>> http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/designtech/destechindex.html  -
>>Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and
>> DATTA Vic - Design and Technology Teachers' Association of Victoria
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: 
>http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/destech/attachments/20170506/97be7349
>/attachment.html 
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>destech mailing list
>destech at edulists.com.au
>http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/destech
>
>
>End of destech Digest, Vol 147, Issue 4
>***************************************

IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.