[Informatics] Factors that harm accuracy. (Warning - bad cow jokes.)
Mark
mark at vceit.com
Fri Sep 2 16:24:35 AEST 2016
Moo, Chris
Yes, I see what you mean: 'Timeliness' is included in the study design -
Informatics U3O2 KK5 - "criteria to check the integrity of data including
*timeliness*, authenticity, relevance, accuracy"
But surely a degradation of *timeliness* would also usually degrade
*accuracy**. *Data that is late to arrive or create can also become
inaccurate, like yesterday's stock prices or eBay bids on an item from 3
seconds ago.
So *timeliness* can affect *accuracy*. But a degradation of *accuracy* would
not affect *timeliness*.
Just because the study design lists separate factors does not mean they
must be completely unrelated.
Regards,
Mark
P.S. I encourage people posting to Edulists to recognise the contribution
of Australian cows to the development of information technology in
Australia. I'm not sure how you could possibly do that, but I encourage it
anyway.
On 2 September 2016 at 15:25, Paragreen, Chris J <
paragreen.chris.j at edumail.vic.gov.au> wrote:
> At the risk of muddying things (rain + paddocks = mud ?!) I think this
> refers to timeliness, rather than accuracy per se ….
>
>
>
> - going out of date - the state of the real world has changed (a few new
> cows were put into the paddock) but the data has not been updated to
> reflect that change.
> Or the number of cows had been copied from one database to a mirrored
> site, but the mirror has not been synchronised recently with the master
> copy so the mirror is no longer representative of the true current size of
> the herd of cows*.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Chris
>
--
Mark Kelly
mark at vceit.com
http://vceit.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/informatics/attachments/20160902/f89b2e11/attachment.html
More information about the informatics
mailing list