<html><body style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><div>Add another 2 cents to the pile.</div><div>I tend to agree with Robert that in the context of data integrity 'correctness' and 'accuracy' are more or less synonymous, but they each do have a different feel to them. "The correctness of the data was called into question" versus "The accuracy of the data was called into question" - maybe it's just me, but 'correctness' has a more holistic feel to it, while 'accuracy' feels much more specific somehow. Hopefully students will never be asked to pin down the subtle distinction</div><div>In light of the discussion so far, I can't resist this entry from a 1926 Webster's Dictionary in my possession:</div>"<b>Correct</b>, <b>Accurate</b>, <b>Exact</b>, <b>Precise</b>, <b>Nice</b> agree in the idea of conformity to standard, fact, or truth. <b>Correct</b>, the most colorless term, denotes scarcely more than freedom from fault or error, as judged by some (usually) conventional or acknowledged standard; as, <i>correct</i> dress, style, deportment; ... <b>Accurate</b> implies, more positively, conformity to fact or truth attained by the exercise of care; as, an <i>accurate</i> investigation, statement, observer. ... <b>Exact</b> emphasizes the strictness or rigor of the agreement, which neither exceeds nor falls short of the fact of standard; ... <b>Precise</b> stresses rather sharpness of definition or delimitation, or scrupulous exactness of conformity to the standard as often verges on excess; ... <b>Nice</b> implies still greater, occasionally excessive, fineness or delicacy of observation or discrimination ...<br /><br />Regards<div>Robert T-A<br /><blockquote><br />----- Original Message -----<br /><div style="width:100%;background:rgb(228,228,228);"><div style="font-weight:bold;">From:</div> "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List" <sofdev@edulists.com.au></div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">To:</div>"Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List" <sofdev@edulists.com.au><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</div><br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</div>Thu, 1 Sep 2016 22:02:36 +1000<br /><div style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</div>Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy andcorrectness<br /><br /><br /><br />
PS - It is woth noting that most writing on data integrity refers to<br />
"accuracy and consistency" and does not mention "correctness"<br /><br />
Robert Hind<br />
Ex Traralgon and Ashwood<br />
Retired<br /><br /><br />
-----Original Message-----<br />
From: Robert Hind [mailto:robert@yinnar.com] <br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 9:54 PM<br />
To: 'Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List'<br />
Subject: RE: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness<br /><br />
Hi all, my 2c worth again - from the perspective of working with data and on<br />
database design since the early 90s.<br /><br />
We are talking here about data integrity.<br /><br />
We are not talking about the accuracy or precision of measurements in terms<br />
number of significant figures or decimal places.<br />
We are not talking about data formats, eg dd/mm/yyyy versus mm/dd/yyyy or<br />
yyyy/mm/dd<br /><br />
Andrew's example of stating his height as 1.564334m IS a measurement<br />
"accurate" to 6 decimal places but it is not accurate/correct as a statement<br />
of his height.<br /><br />
I still consider correctness and accuracy as being synonymous terms when<br />
talking about data integrity.<br /><br />
Robert Hind<br />
Ex Traralgon and Ashwood<br />
Retired<br /><br /><br />
-----Original Message-----<br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au]<br />
On Behalf Of Andrew Pate<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 9:10 PM<br />
To: sofdev@edulists.com.au<br />
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness<br /><br />
Hi all,<br />
I have spoken about accuracy in terms of precision.<br /><br />
I could say I am about 1.8 metres tall. That is correct, but not accurate.<br />
I could say I am 1.564334 metres tall. That is accurate, but not correct.<br />
Each situation will require a different level of accuracy that is acceptable<br />
or expected.<br />
Can't think of a situation where accuracy is important but correctness not.<br /><br />
Andrew Pate<br />
VCE Computing teacher<br />
Mentone Grammar<br /><br />
-----Original Message-----<br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au]<br />
On Behalf Of sofdev-request@edulists.com.au<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 7:11 PM<br />
To: sofdev@edulists.com.au<br />
Subject: sofdev Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7<br /><br />
Send sofdev mailing list submissions to<br />
        sofdev@edulists.com.au<br /><br />
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br />
        http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/sofdev<br />
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br />
        sofdev-request@edulists.com.au<br /><br />
You can reach the person managing the list at<br />
        sofdev-owner@edulists.com.au<br /><br />
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than<br />
"Re: Contents of sofdev digest..."<br /><br /><br />
Today's Topics:<br /><br />
1. Re: Data Integrity:        different        between        accuracy<br />
andcorrectness? (Rattan, Kushum L)<br /><br /><br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />
Message: 1<br />
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:11:17 +0000<br />
From: "Rattan, Kushum L" <rattan.kushum.l@edumail.vic.gov.au><br />
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity:        different        between<br />
        accuracy        andcorrectness?<br />
To: "Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List"<br />
        <sofdev@edulists.com.au><br />
Message-ID:<br /><br />
<8AD033B406E86F408A4144791802A3A0A823BDFA@EDUMBX03.education.vic.gov.au><br /><br />
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br /><br />
My mobile no is same. I was in a meeting when you rang<br /><br />
Kushum Rattan<br />
ICT Curriculum Area Leader<br />
VET Co-ordinator<br />
Gisborne Secondary College<br />
Phone: 03 54283691<br />
rattan.kushum.l@edumail.vic.gov.au<mailto:rattan.kushum.l@edumail.vic.gov.au<br />
><br />
[gsc banner 2]<br /><br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au [mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au]<br />
On Behalf Of David Dawson<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 3:38 PM<br />
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List<br />
<sofdev@edulists.com.au><br />
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness?<br /><br />
And I teach them that dates recorded in this format in a file-naming<br />
convention is both correct and accurate as the files self-sort by date.<br />
YYYYMMDD<br /><br />
[logo]<br /><br /><br />
David Dawson | Head of Learning Technologies, Head of Design and Technology<br />
Wesley College Melbourne<br />
Tel: + 61 3 8102 6340 | Mob: + 61 425 718 147<br />
Email: david.dawson@wesleycollege.net<mailto:david.dawson@wesleycollege.net><br /><br />
577 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, Victoria, Australia Visit our website<br />
www.w<www.wesleycollege.net>esleycollege.net<www.wesleycollege.net><br /><br /><br /><br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au><br />
[mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Travis Parker<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 3:31 PM<br />
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List<br />
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness?<br /><br />
Sorry I did mean the opposite! Big week.<br /><br />
Try again??.<br />
I taught my kids that if you are asked for a date in DD/MM/YYY format in a<br />
program then whilst ?1st of September 2016? is accurate, writing 01/09/2016<br />
is correct.<br /><br /><br /><br />
Travis Parker<br />
Timetabler<br />
The Knox School<br /><br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au><br />
[mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Mark<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 2:40 PM<br />
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List<br />
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness?<br /><br />
I'd say the opposite.<br /><br />
I don't think this question is ever going to be answered until we have a<br />
plebiscite, a Royal Commission or at least a dance-off competition.<br /><br />
Regards,<br />
Mark<br /><br />
On 1 September 2016 at 14:17, Travis Parker<br />
<Travis.Parker@knox.vic.edu.au<mailto:Travis.Parker@knox.vic.edu.au>> wrote:<br />
I taught my kids that if you are asked for a date in DD/MM/YYY format in a<br />
program then whilst ?1st of September 2016? is technically correct, writing<br />
01/09/2016 is accurate.<br /><br />
Mistake???<br /><br /><br /><br />
Travis Parker<br />
Timetabler<br />
The Knox School<br /><br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au><br />
[mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au<br />
>] On Behalf Of Robert Hind<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 1:32 PM<br />
To: 'Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List'<br />
Subject: Re: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness?<br /><br />
I have read Mark's views on this<br />
http://vceit.com/wp/correctness-versus-accuracy/<br /><br />
Don't think they helped :-)<br /><br /><br />
I think they are essentially synonymous:<br />
eg my phone number is 0477999111 is both accurate and correct.<br /><br />
Robert Hind<br />
Ex Traralgon and Ashwood<br />
Retired<br /><br /><br />
________________________________<br />
From: sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au<mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au><br />
[mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au] On Behalf Of Ben Hines<br />
Sent: Thursday, 1 September 2016 12:54 PM<br />
To: Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List<br />
Subject: [Year 12 SofDev] Data Integrity: different between accuracy<br />
andcorrectness?<br />
Hi all,<br /><br />
As part of the five characteristics of data integrity we have both accuracy<br />
and correctness; how do we differentiate the two of these?<br /><br />
Thanks<br /><br />
Ben Hines<br /><br />
Ben Hines<br />
Mathematics and ICT Teacher<br />
Senior Campus<br />
(03)5241 1577<br /><br />
[Image removed by sender. Christian College Geelong]<br /><br />
[Image removed by sender.<br />
https://www.ccg.vic.edu.au/email/images/Enviro.jpg] Please consider the<br />
environment before printing this email.<br /><br />
________________________________<br /><br />
No virus found in this message.<br />
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com><br />
Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4649/12905 - Release Date: 08/29/16<br /><br />
This e-mail is intended for the use of the named individual or entity and<br />
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any dissemination,<br />
distribution or copying by anyone other than the intended recipient of this<br />
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If this e-mail has been received in error,<br />
then please notify Christian College or the author of this email immediately<br />
and destroy the original message. We have made every attempt to ensure this<br />
e-mail message is free from computer viruses however the attached files are<br />
provided on the basis that the user assumes all responsibility for use of<br />
the material transmitted. Views, opinions, etc. expressed reflect those of<br />
the author and not Christian College nor its associated companies and<br />
campuses which includes Eden Quality Services Pty Ltd.<br />
________________________________<br />
Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content<br />
filtering.<br />
http://www.mailguard.com.au<br /><br /><br />
DISCLAIMER<br />
This email message and any related attachments are confidential and should<br />
only be read by those persons to whom they were addressed.<br />
They may contain copyright, personal or legally privileged information.<br />
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, any use of this<br />
information is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted from your system.<br />
Views expressed in this message are the views of the sender and are not<br />
necessarily views of The Knox School, except where the message expressly<br />
states otherwise.<br />
Any advice contained herein should be treated as preliminary advice only and<br />
subject to formal written confirmation. Although this email and any<br />
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or any other defect which<br />
may cause damage or loss, it is the responsibility of the recipient to<br />
ensure that they are virus-free.<br />
The Knox School accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may occur<br />
as a result of the transmission of this email or its attachments to the<br />
recipient.<br /><br />
Please think of the environment before printing this email.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />
____________________________________________________________________________<br /><br />
Sapere Aude - Dare To Be Wise<br /><br />
Wesley College Melbourne is a world class coeducational independent school<br />
developing the whole person through timeless principles of learning:<br />
- to know<br />
- to do<br />
- to live with<br />
- to be<br />
with innovation and wisdom<br /><br />
ABN 55 611 238 530? CRICOS 00354G<br />
____________________________________________________________________________<br /><br />
This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named<br />
above and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If<br />
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any<br />
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly<br />
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please email a reply<br />
to Wesley College Melbourne and destroy the original message.<br />
_______________________________________________<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, Subscribe, Unsubscribe IT Software<br />
Development Mailing List kindly supported by http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au -<br />
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and<br />
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html<br />
http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers<br />
Association Inc http://www.swinburne.edu.au/ict/schools - Swinburne<br />
University<br /><br /><br /><br />
--<br /><br />
Mark Kelly<br /><br />
mark@vceit.com<mailto:mark@vceit.com><br />
http://vceit.com<br />
DISCLAIMER<br />
This email message and any related attachments are confidential and should<br />
only be read by those persons to whom they were addressed.<br />
They may contain copyright, personal or legally privileged information.<br />
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, any use of this<br />
information is strictly prohibited and it must be deleted from your system.<br />
Views expressed in this message are the views of the sender and are not<br />
necessarily views of The Knox School, except where the message expressly<br />
states otherwise.<br />
Any advice contained herein should be treated as preliminary advice only and<br />
subject to formal written confirmation. Although this email and any<br />
attachments are believed to be free of any virus or any other defect which<br />
may cause damage or loss, it is the responsibility of the recipient to<br />
ensure that they are virus-free.<br />
The Knox School accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may occur<br />
as a result of the transmission of this email or its attachments to the<br />
recipient.<br /><br />
Please think of the environment before printing this email.<br /><br />
IMPORTANT - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received<br />
in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using<br />
attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,<br />
damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or<br />
not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our<br />
liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any<br />
representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender,<br />
and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.<br />
-------------- next part --------------<br />
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br />
URL:<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20160901/76f6d6e7/at<br />
tachment.html<br />
-------------- next part --------------<br />
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br />
Name: image002.jpg<br />
Type: image/jpeg<br />
Size: 5210 bytes<br />
Desc: image002.jpg<br />
Url :<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20160901/76f6d6e7/im<br />
age002.jpg<br />
-------------- next part --------------<br />
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br />
Name: image003.jpg<br />
Type: image/jpeg<br />
Size: 1457 bytes<br />
Desc: image003.jpg<br />
Url :<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20160901/76f6d6e7/im<br />
age003.jpg<br />
-------------- next part --------------<br />
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br />
Name: image004.jpg<br />
Type: image/jpeg<br />
Size: 347 bytes<br />
Desc: image004.jpg<br />
Url :<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20160901/76f6d6e7/im<br />
age004.jpg<br />
-------------- next part --------------<br />
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br />
Name: image005.jpg<br />
Type: image/jpeg<br />
Size: 5696 bytes<br />
Desc: image005.jpg<br />
Url :<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au/pipermail/sofdev/attachments/20160901/76f6d6e7/im<br />
age005.jpg <br /><br />
------------------------------<br /><br />
_______________________________________________<br />
sofdev mailing list<br />
sofdev@edulists.com.au<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au/mailman/listinfo/sofdev<br /><br /><br />
End of sofdev Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7<br />
**************************************<br /><br />
_______________________________________________<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, Subscribe, Unsubscribe IT Software<br />
Development Mailing List kindly supported by http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au -<br />
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and<br />
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html<br />
http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers<br />
Association Inc http://www.swinburne.edu.au/ict/schools - Swinburne<br />
University<br />
-----<br />
No virus found in this message.<br />
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<br />
Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4649/12905 - Release Date: 08/29/16<br /><br />
_______________________________________________<br />
http://www.edulists.com.au - FAQ, Subscribe, Unsubscribe<br />
IT Software Development Mailing List kindly supported by<br />
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au - Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and<br />
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/softwaredevel3-4.html <br />
http://www.vitta.org.au - VITTA Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association Inc<br />
http://www.swinburne.edu.au/ict/schools - Swinburne University<br /></blockquote></div></body></html>