<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML dir=ltr xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Helvetica;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Verdana;
}
@page WordSection1 {margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
A:link {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue
}
A:visited {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri",sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d
}
SPAN.EmailStyle20 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri",sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt
}
</STYLE>
<STYLE id=owaParaStyle>P {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 11.00.10586.306"></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-AU vLink=purple link=blue ocsi="0" fPStyle="1">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=712504705-08062016><FONT face=Arial>I am not
teaching at present BUT on reading through criteria 1 to 3 it seems to me that
the size of the project only comes into criterion 2 where for a top mark the
student</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=712504705-08062016><FONT face=Arial>"
<P align=left><FONT size=2 face="Arial Narrow">Acquires multiple complex
data</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT size=2 face="Arial Narrow">sets of different types of
data,</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT size=2 face="Arial Narrow">qualities and structures from
both</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT size=2 face="Arial Narrow">primary and secondary
data</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT size=2 face="Arial Narrow">sources. Uses
appropriate</FONT></P>
<P align=left><FONT size=2 face="Arial Narrow">methods to acquire data
from</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Arial Narrow"><FONT size=2>both types of sources.<SPAN
class=712504705-08062016>"</SPAN></FONT></FONT></P>
<P><FONT face="Arial Narrow"><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=712504705-08062016></SPAN></FONT></FONT> </P>
<P><SPAN class=712504705-08062016>but the quantity of data is not
specified.</SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=712504705-08062016></SPAN> </P><SPAN
class=712504705-08062016>
<DIV align=left>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=141473702-12072015><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Robert Hind</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=141473702-12072015><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Ex Traralgon and Ashwood</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=141473702-12072015><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2
face=Arial>Retired</FONT></SPAN></DIV></DIV></SPAN></FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au
[mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Ciappara, Anthony
A<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, 8 June 2016 3:13 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Year 12 Software
Development Teachers' Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Year 12 SofDev] Limited
SAT Scope and criteria<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma; COLOR: #000000; DIRECTION: ltr">
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri>Hi everybody
<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri>Just wondering how people
handled marking criteria 1-3 when the size of SAT project scopes
differed.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri>How does a limited SAT scope
affect student results for criteria 1-3?<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri>If a student has a simple
SAT project with limited functions are they able to score maximum marks for
criteria 1-3. What if they get everything right, it’s all perfect, but the
project is just limited in size?<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri>Eg. A student has a
simple project. It validates data, does a simple calculation or two, saves data
and allow the user to retrieve data. That’s it. They address all criteria
perfectly, based on this simple project. All their diagrams, SRS and design work
is perfect but quite basic because of their limited scope. Where do their
results stand compared to a student who has a more difficult project and makes
a couple errors? The student with the more difficult project has a lot more
correct, good quality work than the student with the simple
project.<o:p></o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri>I’ve read as much
documentation as I can find but cannot see this scenario
mentioned.</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri><o:p>Thanks in
advance</o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><SPAN lang=EN-AU
style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><FONT face=Calibri><o:p>Anthony
Ciappara</o:p></FONT></SPAN></P>
<P> </P></DIV>
<P></P>
<P><B>Important - </B>This email and any attachments may be confidential. If
received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or
using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss,
damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not,
resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our
liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any
representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and
not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.</P>
<HR SIZE=1 noShade>
<A></A>
<P align=left color="#000000" avgcert??>No virus found in this
message.<BR>Checked by AVG - <A
href="http://www.avg.com">www.avg.com</A><BR>Version: 2016.0.7639 / Virus
Database: 4591/12355 - Release Date: 06/03/16</P></BODY></HTML>