<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style>@font-face {
font-family: Helvetica;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Cambria Math;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Verdana;
}
@page WordSection1 {margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman",serif; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt
}
A:link {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: blue
}
A:visited {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; COLOR: purple
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri",sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d
}
SPAN.EmailStyle20 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri",sans-serif; COLOR: #1f497d
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt
}
</style><style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="purple" fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri">Hi everybody
<?xml:namespace prefix = "o" ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri">Just wondering how people handled marking criteria 1-3 when the size of SAT project scopes differed.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri">How does a limited SAT scope affect student results for criteria 1-3?<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri">If a student has a simple SAT project with limited functions are they able to score maximum marks for criteria 1-3. What if they get everything
right, it’s all perfect, but the project is just limited in size?<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri">Eg. A student has a simple project. It validates data, does a simple calculation or two, saves data and allow the user to retrieve data.
That’s it. They address all criteria perfectly, based on this simple project. All their diagrams, SRS and design work is perfect but quite basic because of their limited scope. Where do their results stand compared to a student who has a more difficult project
and makes a couple errors? The student with the more difficult project has a lot more correct, good quality work than the student with the simple project.<o:p></o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri">I’ve read as much documentation as I can find but cannot see this scenario mentioned.</font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri"><o:p>Thanks in advance</o:p></font></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 8pt"><span lang="EN-AU" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-AU"><font face="Calibri"><o:p>Anthony Ciappara</o:p></font></span></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<p></p><p><b>Important - </b>This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Training.</p>
</body>
</html>