<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>A comment about Re: [Year 12 SofDev] SD key knowledge</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Dear all<BR>
<BR>
My intention was not to impugn the ability and knowledge nor to “target” the panel. I regret that my communication was not as clear as I thought I had made it.<BR>
<BR>
My intention was to note that the study design panel members will have a clear understanding of everything in the study. Thus we should get the word from them.<BR>
<BR>
I have been very much aware of the comments made about the exam in this subject at times and believe that the exam setting panel has been unfairly treated on their interpretation of the study design.<BR>
<BR>
Teaching year 12 students is a very serious matter when , as a teacher, I want my students to do as well as is possible – certainly to achieve their “personal Bests”.<BR>
<BR>
As a consequence I abhor this concept of guessing what is meant and perhaps guessing wrong. I feel that guessing is not doing justice to the trust placed in me by the students and their parents to deliver the best opportunity for them to be successful. Students are under enough pressure already without the teachers upon whom they rely making guesses about content.<BR>
<BR>
When I was Panel chairperson back in the early 90’s I was amazed at the efforts made by teachers. When I marked CATs at VCAA through the 90’s I saw a lot of variation. When I write exams ( as I have for Monash and RMIT and others) I always ensure that I am understand what is meant by the base material. I mark the exams I set so I can see where I might have failed to give the students their real opportunity.<BR>
When I was on the study design panel that produced the 99/2000 study I asked many questions, clarifying the things about which I was unsure of the meaning in the study. When it was implemented I was able to say that I understood what was meant by it.<BR>
<BR>
I came to teaching after some years in other careers. It was a choice, not an accident. I have stayed as a teacher by choice. I believe that we should not guess at content. We should not guess at process. We should learn, communicate, understand, evaluate and eventually reach wisdom. Without self reflection, self evaluation and honesty how can we move forward in our lives and help those whom we seek to lead into knowledge?<BR>
<BR>
The above should, I hope, communicate to you that my intention is not to target anyone but to say that if we do not know then ask those on whose work we rely. If any other concept was communicated to you by my previous email then I regret that my communication was not as clear as I thought I had made it.<BR>
<BR>
Any further comments on this matter should really be made off list, personally, to me, by phone email or fax (as some have already done). There are those on this list aware that most of my communication is off list and it will remain so.<BR>
<BR>
Andrew<BR>
(still passionate about creating authentic learning experiences that enable students to achieve knowledge and understanding, to learn how to learn, to become lifelong learners, to love learning and the opportunities and excitement that can open up, to advance themselves and to enable students to develop passion about what they do. -- vision of old man climbing down off small soapbox and staggering off to say goodnight to his child. )<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT SIZE="4"><FONT FACE="Apple Casual"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:13pt'>Andrew Shortell<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><BR>
<a href="mailto:shortell@get2me.net">mailto:shortell@get2me.net</a> <BR>
Heidelberg Teaching Unit<BR>
Ph 9470 3403<BR>
Fax 9470 3215<BR>
<BR>
c/o Reservoir High School<BR>
855 Plenty Rd<BR>
Reservoir 3073<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 10/03/11 4:55 PM, "Christophersen, Paula P" <<a href="christophersen.paula.p@edumail.vic.gov.au">christophersen.paula.p@edumail.vic.gov.au</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>Dear Andrew<BR>
<BR>
I would like to express my disappointment at the tone and nature of your comments regarding the expertise and the responsibilities of the study design review panel. <BR>
<BR>
Everyone has a right to express their views in a fair and reasonable way, and to me in this instance you have the right to let the VCAA know of your concerns, but I believe that it is unfair and unprofessional to target the individuals comprising the review panel. <BR>
<BR>
I will respond to your study design query tomorrow.<BR>
<BR>
Regards<BR>
Paula<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><FONT COLOR="#000080"><FONT FACE="Arial"> <BR>
<BR>
</FONT></FONT></SPAN></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000080"><FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'>Paula Christophersen<BR>
ICT Curriculum Manager<BR>
VCAA<BR>
41 St Andrews Place<BR>
EAST MELBOURNE 3002<BR>
(03) 9651 4378<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>
</SPAN></FONT>
<P ALIGN=CENTER>
<FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'><HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="2" WIDTH="100%"></SPAN></FONT>
<P>
<FONT SIZE="2"><FONT FACE="Tahoma, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:10pt'><B>From:</B> <a href="sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au">sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au</a> [<a href="mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au">mailto:sofdev-bounces@edulists.com.au</a>] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Andrew Shortell<BR>
<B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, 9 March 2011 8:18 PM<BR>
<B>To:</B> Year 12 Software Development Teachers' Mailing List<BR>
<B>Subject:</B> Re: [Year 12 SofDev] SD key knowledge<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></FONT><FONT FACE="Times New Roman"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12pt'> <BR>
</SPAN></FONT><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Hi Mark<BR>
<BR>
[nice ppt btw]<BR>
<BR>
Each and EVERY member of the study design panel should be able to clearly and unequivocally, definitively answer your question because they put it in the study design. It did not get there by accident. All members of the panel are responsible for the document...<BR>
Members of the panel discuss (and read) the document and have the opportunity to clarify anything that they do not understand.<BR>
Just occasionally something gets missed ... That is why we have errata and corrections published (and I know all about those!)<BR>
<BR>
If it is not an errata the there must be a definitive answer so let’s just ask the panel to provide it rather than us guessing, perhaps not getting it in the way that the panel intended and absolutely missing what the exam setting panel might think. We do NOT want the exam setting panel to receive a torrent of unwarranted adverse comments. <BR>
<BR>
As mature sensible professionals we should all be working towards a common set of understandings that are generously shared (as per this list).<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
[btw – at least a dead dog does not fight you when you stick the cotton bud in to its ears! Try doing an alive Alaskan malamute! ]<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Andrew<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>