<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 November 2013 11:07, Vear, Gary D <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vear.gary.d@edumail.vic.gov.au" target="_blank">vear.gary.d@edumail.vic.gov.au</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">if we accept the textbook classification of online communities.</blockquote>
</div><br>Do we? If you are referring specifically to the Potts textbook's classification, remember that no textbook is gospel.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">The study design says in U3O1 KK 1, "types and purposes of online communities including social, work-based, project/interest-based that<div class="gmail_extra">
support the purposes of collaboration, knowledge sharing and collective identity."</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">This is actually ambiguous. Does it it mean ...</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">"types and purposes of online communities including </div><div class="gmail_extra">(i) social, </div><div class="gmail_extra">(ii) work-based, </div><div class="gmail_extra">(iii) project/interest-based that support the purposes of collaboration, knowledge sharing and collective identity."</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div>Or does it mean...</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">"types and purposes of online communities including </div><div class="gmail_extra">(i) social, </div>
<div class="gmail_extra">(ii) work-based, </div><div class="gmail_extra">(iii) project/interest-based </div><div class="gmail_extra">that <b>(all)</b> support the purposes of collaboration, knowledge sharing and collective identity."<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I read it the second way. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Did you read it the first way?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra">If you read it the first way, it implies that <b>only</b> a project/interest-based community supports collaboration, knowledge sharing and collective identity!</div><div class="gmail_extra">
Neither the social nor work-based communities have need of these things. That does not make a lot of sense to me.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Perhaps Paula can clarify the interpretation of the KK.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div dir="ltr">--<div>Mark Kelly</div><div>mark AT vceit DOT com</div><div><a href="http://vceit.com" target="_blank">http://vceit.com</a></div><div><br></div><div>
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;background-color:rgb(253,253,255)"><font size="1">Day 19, I have successfully conditioned my master to smile and write in his book every time I drool.- Pavlov's Dog</font></span><br>
</div><div><br></div></div>
</div></div>