<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML dir=ltr xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:st1 =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [Year 12 IT Apps] o/t: Gov/AEU Agreement</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3020" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>i agree with u Glenda - the LT2s got very
little</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>the LT1s on the other hand have got an automatic promotion
to LT2 - without needing to demonsrate any of the required skills</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>the Principals have not done well out of this agreement
either </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>andrew grimshaw</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial>colac secondary college</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=harper.glenda.j@edumail.vic.gov.au
href="mailto:harper.glenda.j@edumail.vic.gov.au">Harper, Glenda J</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=itapps@edulists.com.au
href="mailto:itapps@edulists.com.au">Year 12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing
List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 07, 2008 8:34
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Year 12 IT Apps] o/t:
Gov/AEU Agreement</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText33457 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>Hi All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial size=2>Yes, Andrew. The agreement is a
disgrace. I'm not too sure where Leading Teachers fit if teachers "at
the top" have received the largest pay rise. Leading Teachers, who have
maximum responsibility and (usually) full classroom teaching loads, have
<STRONG>proved </STRONG>that they are, in fact "at the top", but are receiving
only a fraction of the pay rise awarded to "Expert" teachers, some of whom
have simply stuck around doing the bare minimum for long enough to reach
the top of the classroom teacher scale. Leading Teachers do not cease to
be highly skilled classroom teachers just because they accept additional
responsibility, work longer hours, be available to students AND other teachers
all lunchtimes, recesses, before and after school . . . To quote one of my
esteemed colleagues: "We have been royally screwed!"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2></FONT> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=idSignature18693 dir=ltr>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#000000>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2></FONT></SPAN></B> </DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT
color=#800000>Glenda Harper<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></B></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><v:line id=_x0000_s1026
style="Z-INDEX: 1; POSITION: absolute" to="528.5pt,70.1pt"
from="-2.5pt,70.1pt"><v:textbox><FONT color=#800000
size=2></FONT></v:textbox></v:line><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT
color=#800000>Sub-School Leader - Senior
Years<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></B></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><FONT
face="Times New Roman"><FONT color=#800000><st1:place w:st="on"><st1:PlaceName
w:st="on"><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Carwatha</SPAN></B></st1:PlaceName><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
<st1:PlaceType w:st="on">College</st1:PlaceType></SPAN></B></st1:place><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">
P-12</SPAN></B></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US><A
href="mailto:harper.glenda.j@edumail.vic.gov.au"><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
color=#0000ff>harper.glenda.j@edumail.vic.gov.au</FONT></SPAN></A></SPAN></B></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman" color=#800000>Ph: 9795
5848</FONT></SPAN></B></DIV>
<DIV class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><SPAN lang=EN-US
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><FONT face="Times New Roman"><FONT color=#800000>Fax:
9790 1712<o:p></o:p></FONT></FONT></SPAN></B></DIV></FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> itapps-bounces@edulists.com.au on behalf
of Andrew Grimshaw<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tue 6/05/2008 11:17 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Year
12 IT Applications Teachers' Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Year 12 IT
Apps] o/t: Gov/AEU Agreement<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>hey all<BR><BR>>From my reading of it I think the deal is a
disgrace. It benefits those at<BR>the top of the expert range and new
gradautes but does nothing for everyone<BR>in between, who have seen the value
of their wages be eroded over the last<BR>18 months<BR><BR>Again the devil
will be in the detail, but in conversation with the AEU on<BR>the telephone
today it was made clear to me that teachers will not be moving<BR>up levels to
gain parity with NSW<BR><BR>True parity with NSW would apply to all teachers,
not just new ones and<BR>those at the top<BR><BR>That is, if you are a 5th
year teacher in Vic, your wage should be<BR>equivalent to a 5th year teacher
in NSW.<BR><BR>Under my understanding of the deal struck a 5th year teacher in
in Vic will<BR>be paid about the same as a 3rd year in NSW<BR><BR>that
is for everyone in the system and not at the top level we have
gained<BR>absolutely nothing and in fact have lost ground - both in pay and
conditions<BR><BR>I hope I am mistaken - I will be waiting with bated breath
to read the<BR>agreement<BR><BR>Andrew Grimshaw<BR>Colac Secondary
College<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From:
<stephen@melbpc.org.au><BR>To: <english@edulists.com.au><BR>Cc:
<offtopic@edulists.com.au>; <itapps@edulists.com.au><BR>Sent:
Tuesday, May 06, 2008 7:26 PM<BR>Subject: [Year 12 IT Apps] o/t: Gov/AEU
Agreement<BR><BR><BR>> Victorian teachers to be nation's
best-paid<BR>><BR>> Farrah Tomazin May 5, 2008 - 11:33AM<BR>> <<A
href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/05/05/1209839508834.html">http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/05/05/1209839508834.html</A>><BR>><BR>>
The education union has hailed a deal that will make Victorian
teachers<BR>> the highest-paid in the country as the best deal for its
members in more<BR>> than 25 years.<BR>><BR>> The agreement between
the State Government and the Australian Education<BR>> Union (AEU) resolves
a 14-month industrial row, which included three<BR>> statewide teachers'
strikes and weeks of rolling half-day stoppages.<BR>><BR>> The unions
had threatened to walk off the job from May 13 to 15,<BR>> disrupting
during the first national literacy and numeracy tests. The<BR>> resolution
of the industrial dispute means those tests are now likely to<BR>> go ahead
without disruption.<BR>><BR>> AEU Victorian branch president Mary Bluett
said it was the best enterprise<BR>> bargaining deal for teachers that she
had seen in 25 years with the union.<BR>><BR>> 11% rise for
some<BR>><BR>> However, there appears to be some contention over the
increases announced<BR>> by Premier John Brumby and Education Minister
Bronwyn Pike this morning.<BR>><BR>> The Government says the deal will
equate to a 4.9% pay rise in the first<BR>> year and 2.7% in the second and
third years of the agreement.<BR>><BR>> But the union believes some of
biggest beneficiaries of the deal will get<BR>> between 8% and
11%.<BR>><BR>> "It's a complex arrangement, but the least any teacher is
going to get out<BR>> of this is somewhere between five and six per cent
per annum,'' Ms Bluett<BR>> said.<BR>><BR>> "This is the best outcome
in terms of salary and career structure in my<BR>> history as a union
official of 25 years standing,'' Ms Bluett said.<BR>><BR>> Pupil-free
days to stay<BR>><BR>> A key sticking point in negotiations was the
issue of pupil-free days,<BR>> which the Government had originally wanted
to abolish.<BR>><BR>> Under the new deal, three pupil free training days
will be brought to the<BR>> start of the term and become professional
training days and only one will<BR>> be held mid-term, in a bid to minimise
disruption to parents.<BR>><BR>> It also includes an exits strategy to
remove disengage teachers from<BR>> classroom and find them new
jobs.<BR>><BR>> Secondary students will get an extra six days of tuition
each year under<BR>> the deal, Mr Brumby said, describing it as a win for
students and<BR>> teachers.<BR>><BR>> "A graduate teacher in Victoria
currently earns $46,127 and under this<BR>> agreement will become the
highest-paid graduate teacher in the country<BR>> earning $51,184, while an
experienced classroom teacher will receive a<BR>> $10,000 pay rise to
$75,500."<BR>><BR>> Mr Brumby said the pay deal was consistent with the
Government's wages<BR>> policy of a 3.25% rise every year, plus increases
off-set by service<BR>> improvement.<BR>><BR>> State-by-state teacher
salaries:<BR>><BR>> Maximum for a classroom teacher<BR>><BR>>
Victoria - 2007: $65,414, 2008: $75,500<BR>><BR>> NSW - 2007: $72,454,
2008: $75,352<BR>><BR>> Queensland - 2007: $69,225, 2008:
$71,994<BR>><BR>> South Australia - 2007: $68,422, 2008:
$68,422<BR>><BR>> West Australia - 2007: $67,446, 2008:
$71,206<BR>><BR>> ACT - 2007: $71,767, 2008: $74,279<BR>><BR>>
Northern Territory: 2007: $70,047, 2008: $72,849<BR>><BR>><BR>>
Graduate Entry<BR>><BR>> Victoria - 2007: $46,127, 2008:
$51,184<BR>><BR>> NSW - 2007: $49,050, 2008: $50,522<BR>><BR>>
Queensland - 2007: $46,950, 2008: $48,829<BR>><BR>> South Australia -
2007: $49,605, 2008: $49,605<BR>><BR>> West Australia - 2007: $44,618,
2008: $45,733<BR>><BR>> ACT: 2007: $50,781, 2008:
$50,781<BR>><BR>> Northern Territory: $49,944, 2008:
$49,944<BR>><BR>> Source: Victorian Government<BR>>
--<BR>><BR>> Cheers people<BR>> Stephen Loosley<BR>> Victoria,
Australia<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> <A
href="http://www.edulists.com.au/">http://www.edulists.com.au</A> - FAQ,
resources, subscribe, unsubscribe<BR>> IT Applications Mailing List kindly
supported by<BR>> <A
href="http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/itapplications3-4.html">http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/itapplications3-4.html</A>
-<BR>> Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and<BR>> <A
href="http://www.vitta.org.au/">http://www.vitta.org.au</A> - VITTA
Victorian Information Technology Teachers<BR>> Association
Inc<BR>><BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR><A
href="http://www.edulists.com.au/">http://www.edulists.com.au</A> - FAQ,
resources, subscribe, unsubscribe<BR>IT Applications Mailing List kindly
supported by<BR><A
href="http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/itapplications3-4.html">http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/studies/infotech/itapplications3-4.html</A>
- Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority and<BR><A
href="http://www.vitta.org.au/">http://www.vitta.org.au</A> - VITTA
Victorian Information Technology Teachers Association
Inc<BR></FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><p></p><p><b>Important - </b>This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.</p>
</BODY></HTML>