<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body style="WORD-WRAP: break-word" dir="ltr" fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<p>Hi everyone I need some opinions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Our students are doing Imaginative Landscape as their Context. The set texts have a strong bias toward the rural Australian landscape but we have a sizable Asian population, many of whom are writing not about the Australian landscape but the landscapes
of their homelands. Much of their writing is rich and engaging.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>From my perspective this should be allowable as they are using the set texts as their jumping off points, but I am getting cold feet wondering if it is acceptable in the exam. I haven't marked Imaginative Landscape... Any comments?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As an aside, I think it is<a></a> a real pity<a></a> that this Context has such a narrow range of texts; there are any number of non-rural reflections on landscape which would meet the text setting criteria and make this more accessible to city dwellers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Gail</p>
</div>
<p></p><p><b>Important - </b>This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.</p>
</body>
</html>