<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style>@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Wingdings;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Calibri;
}
@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@font-face {
font-family: SymbolMT;
}
@page WordSection1 {margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
LI.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman","serif"; FONT-SIZE: 12pt
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
P.MsoAcetate {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"; FONT-SIZE: 8pt
}
LI.MsoAcetate {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"; FONT-SIZE: 8pt
}
DIV.MsoAcetate {
MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"; FONT-SIZE: 8pt
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; COLOR: #1f497d
}
SPAN.BalloonTextChar {
FONT-FAMILY: "Tahoma","sans-serif"
}
.MsoChpDefault {
FONT-SIZE: 10pt
}
</style><style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="purple" fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<p>HI Jenny, </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I think it helps to think of those descriptions as an opening out of what <strong>
can</strong> be done rather than a prescription for what <strong>must</strong> be done. I challenge you to nominate any piece of writing that cannot be fitted to one of the modes or a hybrid of these. I did this exercise with my staff and we couldn't find
anything which could not be seen as fitting; because of this, we have somewhat ( but not completely) de-emphasised the categories and have increased focus on ways of producing "good" writing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Note that in the exam the students <strong>are not allowed</strong> to nominate any style and in fact last time I marked this section, we were told <strong>
</strong>to<strong> disregard</strong> any Explanations which might accompany the Context. This in effect means that the only place the students need to be able to identify how their piece fits into the nominated formats is in their SACs<a></a> in their "explanation
of authorial choices". Our Y12<a></a> teachers agreed that we were doing holistic marking and as we marked the SACs<a></a> we would place the emphasis of our marking on the actual piece of writing more than the Explanation (although we still took this into
account). I personally would not overly-penalise students who mix up the various categories, especially in view of the contradictory information which the students may be accessing. It is interesting that my best students can all provide an excellent Explanation
and those who mix up the information sit in the mid to lower range in any case... ( I may be bad, but I do not lose too much sleep over this)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One of our major difficulties with this section is that the Design itself is unclear as to the task and our approach is always going to be like juggling jelly... you have to find your own way to succeed and some of it will end up on the floor. I do understand
the feelings of the teacher who wants something to cling to -- in its first year everyone was playing safe and Assessors had SOOOOO<a></a> many boring formulaic expository pieces to mark. I also know that variety and freshness and engagement with the writing are
things the Assessors look for. I am afraid we have to lead our staff and our students into more open fields when it comes to this section... and it 'aint<a></a> easy!'
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The awful <strong>how much text </strong>question -- answer: between one word and all of it. I have seen excellent pieces which have used a text as a springboard to dive into new ideas -- for example a student who used the film
<em>Witness</em> as the basis, writing about the Amish practice of Rumspinga<a></a>. There is a clear relationship to the film, a sound platform for discussing Identity<a></a> and Belonging and scope to incorporate the prompt, but it did not draw directly
upon the text. On the other hand there is an occasionally successful strategy which views the plot of a text through the eyes of another character (so this one is nearly all text). The thing to remember is that this is
<strong>not a text response </strong>(50% text is likely to be way over the top in an expository for example). We don't need mention of the text every paragraph or use a formulaic paragraph about the student's experience followed by a paragraph about the text
(few writers are able to make this interesting and engaging) I try to get my students to think about the big ideas, how do we explore these, what will capture the young writers' imaginations/ interest the potential audience?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As for your staff member, I wish you luck (she says, her mind crowded with bitter memories). One of the text books has an excellent section on hybrid writing (It is on my desk at school and I can't remember which one off hand, but I'll let you know if I
remember) you could try giving that to the teacher concerned. For the students at her mercy, how about offering the whole 12 Eng cohort an afternoon of Context-focused writing workshop with the English teachers in attendance<a></a> (Is there a local writer
you could get to facilitate the workshop? Mildura is a relatively big place, there has to be someone who would do it ... or someone prepared to come in from elsewhere<a></a>. VATE<a></a> may have some ideas for people to approach???) This one has the value
of acting as PD for your staff without singling out or confronting ... and it could bring new ideas for everyone.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I don't have many more suggestions and believe me, I can empathise with your predicament. I am not sure that I ever completely succeeded with my guy, but I tried to give oblique gentle shoves and increased exposure to a range of sample responses<a></a>/sample
lessons (Could you do this in an English faculty meeting?) I have just had a meeting with my staff where I asked everyone to bring a sample writing lesson. It was actually a lot of fun and some of that will translate into teaching our Context...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(Hope I haven't done that grandma and egg sucking thing..)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><font size="4" face="Vivaldi"><strong>Gail Reynolds</strong></font></p>
<p>English and Literacy Co-ordinator</p>
<p>Box Hill High School</p>
<p>9877 1177</p>
<p></p>
<hr tabindex="-1">
<p></p>
<div style="FONT-FAMILY: Times New Roman; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 16px">
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr" id="divRpF668535"><font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> english-bounces@edulists.com.au [english-bounces@edulists.com.au] on behalf of Jenny Gilbert [nenifoofer@gmail.com]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, 12 June 2011 11:23 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'VCE English Teachers' Mailing List'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [English] suggestions needed for context teaching<br>
</font><br>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p>Hi Everyone</p>
<p>I have a need for some help in leadership <span style="FONT-FAMILY: Wingdings">
J</span> I have an English teacher that is being quite prescriptive ( she is quite presecriptive with most things) with the writing forms ‘expository, persuasive and imaginative’. She is not dealing well with the combination of possible forms and voices in
written texts. She see them as three completely separate entities. Our teaching of this area of study has evolved over time – and we now see the students as having to ‘create’ as writers using what they know about the Context, text and their understanding
of the concepts in a given prompt. This means we have moved away from strict structural controls for a 5 paragraph essay, although we do teach it for those students who need something to hang their work on as they cling to something of a model. In yr 11 we
do focus on the three modes – in Unit one we focus on expository and persuasive, in Unit two creative. (We used to try and do all 3 in semester 1 but it became a workload nightmare) . In Units 3-4 students choose freely.
</p>
<p>When we first started with context there evolved an understanding of the expository essay form and that wretched formula of third person formal style with 50% use of the text, 25% world and 25% self as a guide for students to structure their writing as informed
by the ideas and issues of the set Context and text. While I have not said do not do this I have encouraged the flexibility and creativity of both students and teachers to see that the limits here are on the boundaries of the text and context not the ‘rules’
of a specific writing genre. I wonder if there are ‘rules’. The way I see it there are typical features of writing depending on purpose, audience and form and we need to teach those over the years so that in Yr 12 students are able to use this knowledge and
their skills to write a response they feel comfortable with. In expository writing students can explore ideas, look at them from a number of angles, and draw conclusions. We are still experiencing confusion with this – students explaining their work as expository
when it clearly argues a view, or vice versa, claiming they have done a persuasive piece that in fact has not clear line of argument and is even lacking a clear contention. The pick ‘persuasive’ simply because in the end they express an opinion.
</p>
<p>Then there is that awful question – how much from outside the text has to be included? It seems the struggle with the grey continues with that 50/25/25 formula. I have – after PD recognised this is not the way to encouraged good creation of texts. Last years
examiners report confirms this</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">On the other hand, it should be noted that:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: SymbolMT; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">• </span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">there still seems to be a dependence on formulaic responses, which suggests that some students believe that</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">rote-learning is sufficient. The study of English is concerned with developing students’ understanding and</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">confidence in responding to the specific topics and prompts that are offered in the examination. Active</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">engagement with texts enables students to develop language awareness, articulate ideas and develop</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">communication skills</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: SymbolMT; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">• </span>
<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">some students did not fully engage with the actual elements of the topics and prompts. Greater care needs to be</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">taken in analysing and recognising the specific expectations of each topic or prompt – often this comes down</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">to a precise understanding of the words which comprise the task</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">In section B the commentary is quite clear</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The most successful responses drew thoughtfully from the text; however, the least successful only used a scene or a</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">feature of character in a superficial way or retold the plot of the text. This approach was not always relevant to the</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">prompt. There can be no definitive advice on the success of relying on a single text or employing both (or more). Some</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">students used the two texts expertly to demonstrate exceptions and qualifications, while others did little more than use</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">the second text to add yet more of the same examples. While students writing using an expository approach tended to</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">employ both texts, a number of students explored only one text. Students who used more than one source to illustrate</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">their ideas often produced pieces with a strong sense of unity and purpose. This cohesiveness was contrasted by pieces</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">where one idea followed the next as students went through their list of examples. The product was more a plan for an</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">essay than a thoughtful, finished piece.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The transference of ideas from the texts is critical. Students who understood and could convey sophisticated ideas from</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt">their texts were the most successful, regardless of the approach to writing selected.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"></span> </p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><a href="http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/vce/studies/english/englishassess/2010/english_assessrep_10.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="COLOR: windowtext">http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vcaa/vce/studies/english/englishassess/2010/english_assessrep_10.pdf</span></a></span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt"></span> </p>
<p>Our focus has been much more on the concepts and ideas in the prompt and text than in writing to a specific formula. Our returning prescriptive teacher is more focussed on the required form and wanting rigorous specific supplementary texts included in the
study. I will refer her to this examiners report and others have provided her with documentation from inservices– but can anyone offer useful definitions of the ‘three explicit’ forms because I can’t. I prefer to paint the grey lines and encourage students
to create with the focus much more on the connection of the concepts and texts. In this instance the labelling of expository, persuasive or imaginative is squishing the potential to write from the heart and mind if it is done as this teacher is suggesting.
SO…..</p>
<p>What suggestions do you have about what I should say to her other than to send her on PD to meet the examiners –I have not yet marked this section so I am at a bit of a loss and relying very much on my experience teaching it, PD and examiners reports.
</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>PS….to add to confusion some publications are now using the word exposition for persuasive writing – how do we deal with that?
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"></span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Jenny Gilbert</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"></span> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">English Coordinator, St Joseph's College Mildura</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Linked IN</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><a href="http://nenifoofer.edublogs.org/" target="_blank"><span style="COLOR: windowtext">Blog</span></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><a href="http://msgsresources.wikispaces.com/" target="_blank"><span style="COLOR: windowtext">Wiki</span></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><a href="http://www.diigo.com/user/nenifoofer" target="_blank"><span style="COLOR: windowtext">Diigo</span></a>
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Jens
<a href="http://livebinders.com/edit?id=6500" target="_blank"><span style="COLOR: windowtext">PLN at Live Binders</span></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Twitter - @nenifoofer</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 11pt"></span> </p>
<p><span style="COLOR: #1f497d"></span> </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p></p><p><b>Important - </b>This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.</p>
</body>
</html>